Abstract:Background: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are involved in intercellular communication and various biological processes. They hold clinical promise for the diagnosis and management of a wide range of pathologies, including cancer, cardiovascular diseases and degenerative diseases, and are of interest as regenerative therapies. Understanding the complex structure of these EVs is essential to perceive the current challenges associated with their analysis and characterization. Today, challenges remain in terms of access to high-yield, high-purity isolation methods, as well as analytical methods for characterizing and controlling the quality of these products for clinical use. Results: We isolated EVs from the same immortalized human cell culture supernatant using two commonly used approaches, namely differential ultracentrifugation and membrane affinity. Then we evaluated EV morphology, size, zeta potential, particle and protein content, as well as protein identity using cryogenic electron microscopy, nanoparticle tracking analysis, asymmetric field flow fractionation (AF4) and size exclusion chromatography (SEC) coupled to multi angle light scattering, bicinchoninic acid assay, electrophoretic light scattering, western blotting and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Compared to membrane affinity isolation, dUC is a more efficient isolation process for obtaining particles with the characteristics expected for EVs and more specifically for exosomes. To validate an isolation process, cryogenic electron microscopy is essential to confirm vesicles with membranes. High resolution mass spectrometry is powerful for understanding the mechanism of action of vesicles. Separative methods, such as AF4 and SEC, are interesting for separating vesicle subpopulations and contaminants. Significance: This study provides a critical assessment of eight different techniques for analyzing EVs, some of which are mandatory for in-depth characterization and deciphering, while others are more appropriate for routine analysis, once the production and isolation process has been validated. The strengths and limitations of the different approaches used are highlighted.

Multi-Parameter And Quantitative Characterization Of Urinary Extracellular Vesicles At Single-Particle Level

Rapid Enrichment and Sensitive Detection of Extracellular Vesicles Through Measuring the Phospholipids and Transmembrane Protein in a Microfluidic Chip.

Single Extracellular Vesicle Analysis Using Droplet Microfluidics.

Single Extracellular Vesicle Analysis Performed by Imaging Flow Cytometry and Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis Evaluate the Accuracy of Urinary Extracellular Vesicle Preparation Techniques Differently

Single extracellular vesicle analysis performed by imaging flow cytometry in contrast to NTA rigorously assesses the accuracy of urinary extracellular vesicle preparation techniques

Single Small Extracellular Vesicle (sEV) Quantification by Upconversion Nanoparticles.

An Integrated Double-Filtration Microfluidic Device for Detection of Extracellular Vesicles from Urine for Bladder Cancer Diagnosis.

Sequencing-Based Protein Analysis of Single Extracellular Vesicles.

A Single Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Flow Cytometry Approach to Reveal EV Heterogeneity

Single Extracellular Vesicle Transmembrane Protein Characterization by Nano-Flow Cytometry

Analytical challenges of extracellular vesicle detection: A comparison of different techniques

Protein Profiling and Sizing of Extracellular Vesicles from Colorectal Cancer Patients via Flow Cytometry.

Analysis of Single Extracellular Vesicles for Biomedical Applications with Especial Emphasis on Cancer Investigations

Development of complementary analytical methods to characterize extracellular vesicles

An integrated double-filtration microfluidic device for isolation, enrichment and quantification of urinary extracellular vesicles for detection of bladder cancer

Ultracentrifugation-Free Enrichment and Quantification of Small Extracellular Vesicles.

Rapid Characterization and Quantification of Extracellular Vesicles by Fluorescence‐Based Microfluidic Diffusion Sizing

Ultrafiltration and size exclusion chromatography combined with asymmetrical-flow field-flow fractionation for the isolation and characterisation of extracellular vesicles from urine

Quality and Efficiency Assessment of Six Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Methods by Nano-Flow Cytometry.

Large Extracellular Vesicles Can be Characterised by Multiplex Labelling Using Imaging Flow Cytometry

Toward characterizing extracellular vesicles at a single-particle level