Capital Hegemony in the Regulation of National Fourism Resource:A Case Study of Nankun Hot Spring in Guangdong Province

LI Peng,BAO Ji-gang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2015.07.005

2015-01-01

Abstract:Nature resource was dominantly understood in physical terms previously. When nature resource was not considered abundant and freely available anymore, the‘management’of non-human natures became im-portant with the capitalization and marketization of nature resources. Resource, therefore, is political as a spe-cific outcome of competing claims over access to, controling over, and definition of nature. This process of so-cial negotiation is highly relevant with the regulation concept. Adopting the above understanding of the nature resource and using the methods of field survey, document analysis and in-depth interviews, this article exam-ines the power and social process of the regulation on one of the hot spring destinations in Guangdong Prov-ince. The results show that the central government, the local government, the developer and the local communi-ties are all play significant roles on the regulation process. Following the market path regulated by the central government, the private developer gradually takes the place of the central government and becomes the influen-tial actor by allying with the local government. To some extent, the alliance between the private developer and the local government dominates the regulation process of the hot spring destination, and even transgresses the market law. During this process, the property rights of the local communities are displaced or even deprived without the support of legal authorities. In order to achieve the goal of a sustainable and healthy development of the hot spring destination, the rights of the local communities should be considered and the more standard-ized market-oriented mechanisms should be formulated in practice. The concept of resource regulation de-scribes the processes by which the inherent tensions over resource definition, resource access and resource use are managed and contained. Different from that of much geographical literature on resources which circum-scribes resource regulation as resource management enacted by an administrative state, we argue that the equa-tion of resource regulation with state-based institutions of resource management is anachronistic and unsatis-factory because this understanding ignores the role of non-state actors and local communities play on regula-tion process. It is not a way of ensuring inputs from nature or controlling pollution to flow to nature, but the ne-gotiation of a dynamic landscape that is neither fully natural nor fully social. This managerial approach to re-source relaxes the absolute view of physical scarcity by recognizing how society can produce or historically has produced supply shortages. Therefore, the study of resource regulations is significant in practice.