Companionship Choice and Its Social-Cultural Effect:Beijing and Utrecht Compared

ZHAO Ying,CHAI Yan-wei,Martin Dijst
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2014.08.022
2014-01-01
Abstract:There is a long history to draw big distinctions of cultures between West and East with the constructs of individualism and collectivism. This coincides with a growing awareness that society change diversified in the process of modernization from the perspective of activity-travel behavior, but limited attention has been paid to investigation of companionship choice for non-work activity and travel. This article contributes to the knowledge on how to examine cultural differences by presenting estimation of companionship choice in activi-ty-travel behavior, based on activity diary surveys collected in Beijing (China) and Utrecht (the Netherlands) both in 2007. The types of companionship could be divided into 4 categories, including alone, friend, core fam-ily member and other family members, which present the ordered degree from individualized to collective ten-dencies. According to descriptive analysis, the companionship share shows people in Beijing perform more of-ten with others, yet those in Utrecht tend to perform more alone. If accompanied, people in Beijing conduct more activities with family members, but people in Utrecht conduct more with friends. Other family members dominate a considerable percentage as companions in Beijing but not in Utrecht. The findings indicate that peo-ple in Beijing behave more collectively, yet people in Utrecht behave more individually. According to MNL es-timation, it shows important differences observed on socio-demographic, life cycle and activity type. In Bei-jing, women with cars from‘big families’are likely to conduct more leisure and social activities with family members, while older men tend to have more joint activity with other families or friends. These results are as-sociated with Confucian culture and strong family tradition in Chinese society. In Utrecht, high-income men with cars from single families are likely to conduct more activities alone. These respond to independent life style in the Netherlands. In both two cities, people from couple or core families with young kids tend to per-form activity with core family members, which shows family-obligation is an important factor for companion-ship. For the influence of activity types, the result shows leisure or social purposes encourage joint activity, par-ticularly with friends. These findings are intended to provide evidence on collectivism is popular in Eastern so-ciety but individualism is prevalent in Western society. It discusses the social integration and value tendency in Chinese and Dutch society from activity-travel behavior perspective, and also points out some shortcomings in this article supposed as a stimulant for further analysis on cultural differences.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?