Heat flow, deep formation temperature and thermal structure of the Tarim Basin, Northwest China

Shaowen LIU,Xianglan LI,Chunyan HAO,Xudong LI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13745/j.esf.2017.03.004
2017-01-01
Earth Science Frontiers
Abstract:The geothermal regime of a sedimentary basin not only provide constraints on the treatments of basin formation and evolution,but also offers basic geothermal parameters for the hydrocarbon resource assessment.As one of the three Precambrian blocks in China,the Tarim craton,the largest superimposed sedimentary basin,is also a main target in a current hydrocarbon exploration with great potential.Although considerable advancement has been made on the basin's geothermal regime during the last few decades,nearly all the temperature data used in previous studies were formation testing temperatures from exploration boreholes.These temperature data lacked confidence to some extent,due to insufficient time allowed to reach steady state at the time of measurements.Recently,we have conducted the steady-state temperature logging in the Tarim Basin and measured abundant data on rock thermal properties,which enabled us to re-visit the thermal regime.Our results demonstrate that the presensent day geothermal gradient for the Tarim Basin varies from 15 to 30 ℃/km,while heat flow ranges from 26 to 66 mW/m2 with a mean of 43 mW/m2.These new data confirm that the Tarim Basin has a relatively low heat flow and shares similar geothermal regime with other Precambrian cratons in the world.Furthermore,spatial distribution of the estimated formation temperature at the depth of 1-5 km within the basin is also similar and mainly controlled by the crystalline basement pattern.In general,temperatures at the depth of 1 km range between 29 and 41 ℃ with a mean of 35 ℃,while at 3 km they vary from 63 to 100 ℃ with a mean of 82 ℃;at 5 km below the surface,temperatures fall into a range between 90 and 160 ℃ with a mean of 129 ℃.In addition,the estimated formation temperatures at the bottom surfaces of the Paleozoic marine source rocks are still within the oil window.Hence we further propose that the longterm low geothermal background and large burial depth are the favorable conditions for hydrocarbon generation and preservation.As far as heat budget is concerned in the Tarim Basin,the radiogenic heat from the sedimentary cover (~9 mW/m2) accounts for only 20% of the observed surface heat flow,while the mantle heat flow is estimated to be as low as 6-15 mW/m2,similar to that in the Precambian cratons.This heat budget demonstrates that the dominant contribution to the surface heat flow comes from the crustal radiogenic heat.Any variations in surface heat flow for the Tarim Basin can be due only to changes in crustal heat production or crustal thickness.Thermal contrast between the Tarim Basin and Tibet Plateau,represented by a difference in surface heat flow and deep crustal temperature,is remarkable.This inherited thermal contrast can be traced back as far as before the India-Asia collision.Moreover,the lithosphere beneath the Tarim Basin is sufficiently strong to resist the gravitational potential energy difference and tectonic forces from Tibet.The observed lithospheric thermal and rheological contrast,therefore,can account for the differential Cenozoic deformationin the Tarim Basin and surrounding areas.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?