Quantitative characterization of pore structure of tight gas sandstone reservoirs by NMR T2 spectrum technology:a case study of Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstone reservoir in Linqing depression

Fang Tao,Zhang Likuan,Liu Naigui,Zhang Liqiang,Wang Weimin,Yu Lan,Li Chao,Lei Yuhong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7623/syxb201708005
2017-01-01
Abstract:Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) provides a new method for quantitative characterization of pore structure of tight sandstone with high accuracy, fast and non-destructive measurement of micro-nano-scale pores.Based on NMR T2 spectrum method scaled by mercury injection data, aiming at inaccurate measurement caused by the mercury injection saturation less than 100% in tight sandstone, the mercury injection curve and T2 spectrum are accumulated from largest pore on the right boundary to small pore on the left side;it is suggested to select the pore-throat radius range of mercury injection measurement in the rightward accumulated curve as the comparative interval of NMR pore-throat radius.In addition, the longitudinal interpolation and the least squares method are adopted to construct the pore-throat radius distribution curve transformed by T2 spectrum.The Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstone gas reservoir in eastern Linqing depression is chosen as research object to quantitatively study the pore structure characteristics using the NMR T2 spectrum, pore-throat radius conversion coefficient and distribution obtained by improved method.Based on rock thin-section and SEM observations, the difference genesis of pore structure and reservoir effectiveness of tight sandstone are also discussed.The results show that the NMR pore-throat radius curve obtained by the improved method is highly consistent with the mercury injection curve, significantly increasing the accuracy of NMR test in tight sandstone.In the Carboniferous-Permian tight sandstone of the study area, pore-throat radius is mainly distributed in the range of 0.002-2μm, generally corresponding to submicron-nano pores.However, the pore-throat radius distribution varies obviously with different sandstone types.Lithic quartz sandstone is rich in silicon, lacking plastic debris and matrix, generally dominated by submicron pore throat, including micron pore throat.Lithic feldspar sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone (rich in quartz) has high content of quartz, and low contents of plastic debris and matrix, generally classified as submicron-nano pore throat (dominated by nanos).Feldspar lithic sandstone (rich in lithic fragments) and lithic sandstone are poor in quartz while rich in plastic debris and matrix, mainly classified as nano pore-throat with radius less than 0.05μm.Microscopic petrographic components are key factors controlling pore structure variability and reservoir effectiveness.On the macroscopic level, reservoir quality may be controlled by sedimentary microfacies.The coarse-and fine-grained micofacies lithic quartz sandstones stranded in the point bar or river bed are the most favorable reservoirs.Fine-grained micofacies lithic feldspar sandstones at the point bar and feldspar lithic sandstones (quartz-rich) in diversion channels or at barrier dams can be considered as relatively effective reservoirs, while the feldspar lithic sandstones (rich in lithic fragments) and lithic sandstones of tide-flat facies are always invalid reservoirs with extremely poor reserving capability and permeability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?