Jurassic-Neogene conglomerate characteristics in Kuqa Depression and their response to tectonic uplifting of Tianshan Mountains

Gao Zhiyong,Zhu Rukai,Feng Jiarui,Li Xiaopei,Zhao Xuesong,Guo Meili
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11743/ogg20150402
2015-01-01
Abstract:Samples from multiple sets of the Jurassic-Neogene conglomerate outcrops in Kuqa depression were collected and analyzed for the composition,flatness,sphericity,and size of gravel,and the sedimentary facies that had made everything happened,and for a semi-quantitative study of transportation distance of gravel in front of southern Tianshan Mountain.The results show a far-to-near pattern of gravel transport distance for the Jurassic-Neogene conglomerate.Gravels in the Lower Jurassic Ahe-Yangxia Formations migrated the farthest to 110-130 km,and those from the Neogene Jidike Formation moved the shortest at only 20 km.Between them,the gravels of the Upper Jurassic Kelaza Formation moved about 40 km,that of the Lower Cretaceous Yageliebu-Bashijiqike Formations ran at a distance range between 20 and 45 km and that in the Palaeo-gene conglomerate transported from 20 to 50 km.Combined with the previous apatite fission track data,the new results indi-cate that the uplift of the Tianshan Mountains can be divided into 4 stages( two of them were major unplifting and two of them were minor ones):the Triassic-Early Jurassic,Late Jurassic-Early Cretaceous,Late Cretaceous-Eocene,and Miocene-present.The composition,shape and size of the gravels as well as migration of provenance reflected by the gravel transport distance show that the sedimentary evolution of the conglomerate responded strongly to the 4 stages of uplifting process.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?