Daily Estimate of Global 36 km Grid Soil Moisture

Yanchang JIA,Mowen XIE,Hongtao JIANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1560-8999.2017.06.015
2017-01-01
Abstract:Soil moisture is one of the core variables in land surface ecosystem and energy cycle. For the strong penetration of the cloud, rain and atmosphere, microwave remote sensing has advantages of the high precision in soil moisture retrieval. Currently, there are many passive microwave sensors or satellites used for surface soil (<5 cm) moisture observations, such as NASA's AMSR-E (The Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer-Earth Observing System) and SMAP (the Soil Moisture Passive and Active) and the European Space Agency SMOS (The Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity). Although the use of microwave sensor can get higher precision of soil moisture products. The errors of SMAP 36 km soil moisture products can be less than 0.04 m3/m3. The 2~3 days revisited time restricts the applications that need the soil moisture products with higher temporal resolution (1 days). Therefore, it has been drawn more and more attention to get the accurate soil moisture with higher temporal resolution for the global weather prediction. Although the SM retrieval from MODIS data has higher error than retrieval from passive microwave data, the temporal resolution of MODIS data (1 day) is higher than the passive microwave data. For the different advantages of MODIS and passive microwave data, the combination of the two data for soil moisture retrieval may get the SM products with the MODIS temporal resolution and the similar accuracy or similar spatial variation of passive microwave data. In this study, we attempt to combine SMAP 36 km soil moisture product and MODIS optical/thermal infrared data to estimate the global 36 km soil moisture. This improve the temporal resolution of SMAP soil moisture from the 2~3 days to 1 day. By using the generalized regression neural network (GRNN) method, we simulated the relationship of SMAP soil moisture with MODIS global surface temperature and the surface reflectance products. Then we estimated the global 36 km soil moisture using the GRNN simulated relationship. In order to prevent overfitting of GRNN, all sample data according to the ratio of 0.8:0.2 is divided into training dataset and validation dataset. With the increase of the spread factor, the performance of GRNN prediction of the validation dataset shows a decreasing trend after the first increase, and GRNN obtained the maximal correlation coefficient (r) and root mean square error (rmse) with 0.02 of the diffusion factor. Finally, the well trained GRNN is used to estimate the global 36 km soil moisture. The results show that the accuracy of the GRNN for soil moisture estimate has a high correlation with SMAP (r=0.7528), but it retains a high error (RMSE=0.0914 m3/m3). For the cloud contamination of MODIS data, there has a part of loss of GRNN 36 km soil moisture estimate. Nevertheless, the GRNN estimated soil moisture can be very good to maintain the overall spatial variation of SMAP soil moisture, and enhance the temporary resolution of soil moisture from 2~3 days to one day. Besides, the relationship between SMAP and MODIS data is also studied in this paper, which can provide a significant reference for SMAP 36 km soil moisture downscaling by the machine learning.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?