Study on the Application of Quantitative Analysis of Iron Oxides by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy in the Loess of South China

Xiaokang YUAN,Xusheng LI,Zhiyong HAN,Wancang ZHAO,Yuwen ZHOU,Shuangshu WU,Yanhua ZHENG,Huayu LU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2016216
2017-01-01
Abstract:The diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS)has been applied successfully in the Chinese Loess Plateau,but it is not clear whether the DRS can be applied in the South China or not.Therefore,we choose the loess located in the South China to study.In order to determine the content of hematite and goethite,we derived regression equations by removing the free iron from the matrix by CBD and adding different proportions of hematite and goethite into it.Thus,the content of the iron oxide was obtained.The results show that the estimate of hematite is consistent with the actual hematite concentration,while the content of goethite fails to be verified.The reasons might be:(1) In the sample,hematite and goethite are mutually matrix to each other.Hametite affects goethite more than goethite affects hematite.The matrix effect,which plays an important role in the regression equations,is noticeable in South China;(2) The CBD cannot remove goethite derived from the rock,which is coarser and more crystalized than the secondary one formed by soil.As a result,the concentration obtained by DRS is different from the actual concentration of goethite mixed;(3) Because of the hot,humid climate in South China,A1 substitution can take place easily in the soil.The crystal structure of goethite leads to more substituted Al than hematite,which means that the result might be wrong.To conclude,DRS can be applied to the hematite in South China,but one needs to be cautious when it comes to goethite.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?