Review, framework, and future perspectives of Geographic Knowledge Graph (GeoKG) quality assessment
Shu Wang Peiyuan Qiu Yunqiang Zhu Jie Yang Peng Peng Yan Bai Gengze Li Xiaoliang Dai Yanmin Qi a State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System,Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,Chinab Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing,Chinac School of Surveying and Geo-Informatics,Shandong Jianzhu University,Jinan,Chinad Institute for Transport Study,University of Leeds,Leeds,UKe Institute of Transportation Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing,Chinaf School of Computer Science,University of Nottingham Ningbo,Ningbo,ChinaShu Wang is an assistant professor at Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. He received the PhD degree from Nanjing Normal University. His main research interests are Geographic Knowledge Graph (GeoKG),spatio-temporal data mining,and their applications for achieving the SDGs.Peiyuan Qiu received his PhD degree from University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. His research interests include geographic knowledge graph and spatiotemporal big data mining.Yunqiang Zhu is a professor at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. He is interested in studying the spatial-temporal knowledge graph,spatial information technology research and application,scientific data sharing,and e-Geoscience.Jie Yang is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. His main research interests are the Geographic Knowledge Graph (GeoKG) technologies and intelligent matching of data and models.Peng Peng is an associate professor at Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. He mainly engaged in complex geographical network analysis and maritime spatial-temporal data mining research.Yan Bai is an associate professor at Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. Her research interests include data quality control and evaluation and global change and ecological remote sensing.Gengze Li is a postdoc researcher at the Institute of Transportation Engineering,Tsinghua University. His research interests include the transport and land use interaction models,digital economic and urban development studies.Xiaoliang Dai is a PhD candidate at the Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences. His primary research interests include spatiotemporal knowledge graphs,spatial representation learning,and spatially explicit machine learning.Yanmin Qi is a PhD candidate from University of Nottingham Ningbo China. His research interests is to use geographic knowledge graphs for intelligent model calculation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2024.2403785
IF: 4.278
2024-09-22
Geo-spatial Information Science
Abstract:High-quality Geographic Knowledge Graphs (GeoKGs) are highly anticipated for their potential to provide reliable semantic support in geographical knowledge reasoning, training Geographic Large Language Models (Geo-LLMs), enabling geographical recommendation, and facilitating various geospatial knowledge-driven tasks. However, there is a lack of a standardized quality assessment methodology and clearly defined evaluative indicators in the field of GeoKGs research. This research uses the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology to conduct a systematic review of literature and standards in the field of GeoKG in an effort to fill the gap. First, using the lifecycle theory as a guide, we outline and propose five groups including twenty assessment criteria and their accompanying calculation techniques for evaluating GeoKG quality. Then, expanding on this foundation, we present a streamlined evaluation scheme for GeoKGs that relies on just seven key measures, discussing their applicability, utility, and weight scheme in greater detail. After applying the GeoKG quality framework, we stated three key tasks emerge as priorities: the creation of specialized assessment tools, the formation of worldwide standards, and the building of large-scale, high-quality GeoKGs. We believe this thorough and systematic GeoKG quality assessment technique will help construct high-quality GeoKGs and promote GeoKGs as an engine for geo-intelligence applications including Geospatial Artificial Intelligence (GeoAI) systems, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) analyzers, and Virtual Geographic Environments (VGEs) models.
remote sensing