Abstract:We study the impact of the number and type of calibration parameters on surface‐subsurface hydrologic model performance. We employ a framework of sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameter estimation. We use results to evaluate parameterisation choices for two watersheds of diverse hydrologic features. We investigate the effect of calibration versus testing period length on the robustness of hydrologic model performance, providing insights into temporal considerations for model evaluation. Distributed, coupled surface‐groundwater hydrologic models are high‐dimensional, given the necessity to reflect the spatially diverse nature of complex hydrologic processes. Furthermore, inverse/inference problems involving these high‐dimensional models are naturally ill‐posed, given the limited information content of state observations that are typically assimilated. Many inversion/inference algorithms do not cope well with high dimensionality, leaving the practitioner to make subjective choices related to uncertain model inputs. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of these subjective calibration choices within a formal sensitivity analysis, uncertainty analysis, and parameters estimation (SA‐UA‐PE) framework on model testing for a surface‐subsurface hydrologic model. In doing so, we address the concepts of 'over‐parameterisation' and 'under‐parameterisation'. We completed a series of numerical experiments, testing several otherwise subjective aspects of the calibration process: (1) the number (5, 10, 15, 20) and type (soil, aquifer, land surface, channel) of calibration parameters selected); (2) the type of state observations assimilated (streamflow, groundwater head); and (3) the length of testing period (1 to 14 years), using monthly streamflow and groundwater head as testing data. The experiments were completed for models of the Winnebago River watershed (Minnesota, Iowa), (significant tile drainage) and the Nanticoke River watershed (Delaware, Maryland (significant groundwater‐channel interactions). The selected hydrologic model is SWAT+, using the gwflow module for physically based groundwater storage and flow modelling, and simulations are run for the 2000–2015 period. Through this process, we found that increasing the number of parameters from 5 to 15 improves the representation of streamflow, principally through an improvement of groundwater storage representation and baseflow generation, but minimal improvement when increasing to 20 parameters. Therefore, the SA‐UA‐PE process can be optimised based on an ideal number of parameters that yield adequate results while maintaining a lower computational burden. The method presented here can be used for any watershed, using integrated surface‐subsurface hydrologic models.

Impact of Objective Function Weight on Hydrological Calibration of PEST-HSPF

Impact Of Two Calibration Strategies On Flow Simulation In Qiantang River Basin, China

Improved Simulation of Peak Flows under Climate Change: Postprocessing or Composite Objective Calibration?

Investigating the Uncertainty and Transferability of Parameters in Swat Model under Climate Change

Impact of Calibration Objective on Hydrological Model Performance in Ungauged Watersheds

Flood forecasting methods with precipitation prediction and multi-objective parameter optimization

Hydrologic Model Application Based on Automatic Calibration with PEST

Searching for an Optimized Single-objective Function Matching Multiple Objectives with Automatic Calibration of Hydrological Models

Research on the HSPF Hydrologic Simulation based the PEST Automatic Calibration-Case Study:Guishui River Basin,Beijing

Hydrological Modeling of the Jiaoyi Watershed (china) Using HSPF Model.

A comprehensive framework for HSPF hydrological parameter sensitivity, optimization and uncertainty evaluation based on SVM surrogate model- A case study in Qinglong River watershed, China

An automatic calibration framework based on the InfoWorks ICM model: the effect of multiple objectives during multiple water pollutant modeling

Comparing multi-objective optimization techniques to calibrate a conceptual hydrological model using in situ runoff and daily GRACE data

Uncertainty in Simulation of Land-Use Change Impacts on Catchment Runoff with Multi-Timescales Based on the Comparison of the HSPF and SWAT Models

Enhanced SWAT calibration through intelligent range-based parameter optimization

Effects of single‐ and multi‐site calibration strategies on hydrological model performance and parameter sensitivity of large‐scale semi‐arid and semi‐humid watersheds

Assessment Of The Spatial And Temporal Variations Of Water Quality For Agricultural Lands With Crop Rotation In China By Using A Hype Model

Quantifying the Role of Calibration Strategies on Surface‐Subsurface Hydrologic Model Performance

Evaluation Method of Multiobjective Functions' Combination and Its Application in Hydrological Model Evaluation

Multi-objective synchronous calibration and Pareto optimality of runoff and sediment parameters in an arid and semi-arid watershed

Considering flood scaling property in multi-objective calibration of the SWAT model: a case study in Zijinguan watershed, Northern China