MATING SYSTEM EVOLUTION, RESOURCE ALLOCATION, AND GENETIC DIVERSITY IN PLANTS

张大勇,姜新华
2001-01-01
Abstract:Two basic forces affect the evolution of plant mating systems.Selfing will be favored if it increases seed set when polle n is limiting (reproductive assurance) or increases siring success when pollen d evoted to selfing is more likely to accomplish fertilization than pollen devoted to outcrossing (automatic selection advantage). Experimental and observational studies, however, have yet to identify more precisely the set of ecological cond itions under which either of those advantages can be expressed. Pollen discounti ng reduces a selfers' success as an outcross pollen parent, i.e. lowering au tomatic selection advantage, and inbreeding depression is expected to reduce any advantage selfers might gain through reproductive assurance or automatic selection. Changes in a species' mating system are likely to induce evolutionary adjus tments in its resource allocation. Theory predicts that sex allocation, or the proportion of reproductive resources allocated to male function in hermaphroditic plants, decreases as the selfing rate increases, and that total reproductive al location increases with increased selfing if inbreeding depression is not so sev ere as to prevent the evolution of self-fertilization. In some extreme conditio ns, increased selfing may lead to severe change in life history, i.e. from peren niality to annuality. Sex allocation theory provides a general explanation for diversity in breeding systems, in particular, it explains why most flowering plan ts are hermaphroditic. While empirical evidence is abundant that supports the ex pected decrease in sex allocation as selfing rate increases, there has been no demonstration of the expected correlation between mating system and total reprodu ctive effort. Selfing tends both to reduce the level of genetic variability with in populations and to increase the amount of genetic differentiation among popul ations. A longtime conjecture that selfers may give up some long-term evolution ary flexibility has now been partially confirmed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?