Phylogenetic relationship analysis of genus Rhododendron (Ericaceae) from Mountain Tai based on ITS2 sequences and morphological traits

Hong-Yue CAI,Shu-Tang XING,Rong-Rong HE,Bo ZHOU,Fei ZHAO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2017.0002
2017-01-01
Abstract:A study to evaluate the relationships in subgenus of Rhododendron and clarify classification of the native R. micranthum, R. mucronulatum, R. mariesii, R. simsii and R. molle in Mountain Tai was undertaken us-ing both morphological traits and molecular analysis of the DNA sequence variation of the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions. Phylogenetic tree was constructed, using maximum parsimony meth-od, based on ITS2 sequences of 92 species, 9 subgenera, which included 8 samples of 5 species from Mountain Tai, 84 samples from GenBank database, Cassiope fastigiata and Enkianthus quinqueflorus as outgroups; phy-logenetic analysis was performed on the basis of 24 phenotypic characters of 18 species representing 9 subge-nuses. The results revealed that Rhododendron is a polyphyletic group, and evolutionary degree of each subge-nus is balanced. Among the 5 species from Mountain Tai, the R. mariesii failed to gather in the branch of subg. Tsutsusi, and other 4 species were located in the major branches of their own subgenuses. The quantitative clus-ter analysis based on morphological features showed that the line of distance coefficient of 18 can be used as the demarcation line of the subgenus. The monophyly of sect. Choniastrum (subg. Azaleastrum), sect. Azaleas-trum (subg. Azaleastrum) and sect. Ponticum (subg. Hymenanthes) was strongly supported, while there was no significant difference between subsections in sect. Ponticum. Subgs. Pentanthera and Therorhodion were locat-ed at the base of phylogenetic tree, which was consistent with morphological classification results.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?