Distrubution Characteristics of Heavy Metals in PM2.5, PM10 and TSP around Electroplating Factories and the Health Risk Assessment

Weituo Zhao,Juan Chen,Weiping Hu,Ting Huang,Li Guo,Shenggao Cheng,Xiaowen Gu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20161211001
2017-01-01
Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
Abstract:This study aimed to investigate the pollution level and human health risk of heavy metals in PM2.5,PM10 and total suspended particulate (TSP) around electroplating factories.Samples were collected from five towns of Dongguan City to measure 12 kinds of heavy metals (As,Co,Cd,Cr,Cu,Mn,Ni,Pb,Sb,V,Zn,and Hg).Enrichment factor,geoaccumulation index,Hakanson and US EPA risk assessment guidance for superfimd were carried out respectively.Our results showed that concentrations of As,Cd and Cr in PM2.5,PM10 and TSP were higher than their limited values of the corresponding quality standards.Cr,Ni and V in PM2.5,PM10 and TSP mainly orinated from the natural source.As,Co,Cu,Pb,and Zn probably came from natural source with addition of industrial pollution.Concentrations of Cd,Hg and Sb were mainly derived from human pollution.Cd,Sb,Cu,Zn and Pb as bioavailable elements (K > 0.6),showed high mobility in the environment,which could be rapidly absorbed by organism and human body.The non-carcinogenic risk of Mn was 1-4 orders of magnitude higher than that of other heavy metals,and HQ value for non-carcinogenic risk in children were higher than in adults.The HI value of heavy metals for non-carcinogenic risk were higher than the human acceptable limit value 1.0 in three kinds of particles through inhalation exposure,which was attributed to the contribution of Mn.The non-carcinogenic risk in the study area was serious.The CR value of adult cancer risk was greater than 10-4 in terms of inhalation of Co in PM10 and TSP,and Cr in TSP.However,CR values for most of the other heavy metals were within the acceptable range.In addition,CRT values for the adult carcinogenic risk of the three kinds of particles were higher than those of children.CRT value for the children carcinogenic risk of heavy metals in PM2.5 was less than the upper acceptable limit for human body (10-4),while all the other CRT values were higher than 10-4,indicating that the carcinogenic risk was also serious.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?