Life-cycle Toxicity of Two Generation Chironomus kiiensis Induced by Diuron Used in Antifouling Paints

Yanan Liu,Xiaoqian Chen,Min Liu,Zhongliang Zhou,Haowen Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7524/AJE.1673-5897.20160219001
2017-01-01
Asian Journal of Ecotoxicology
Abstract:To evaluate environmental toxicity of Diuron,a biocidally active substance commonly used in antifouling paints,the two generation life-cycle toxicity of Chironomus kiiensis was conducted according to the OECD testing guideline 233,namely Sediment-Water Chironomid Life-Cycle Toxicity Test Using Spiked Water or Spiked Sediment.Chironomus kiiensis,one of sediment-dwelling organisms,fully covering the parental generation (P generation) and the offspring generation (F1generation),were exposed to Diuron which was added to overlying water at the concentrations of 1.22 mg·L-1,1.94 mg·L-1,3.08 mg·L-1,4.88 mg·L-1,7.74 mg·L-1 and 12.26 mg·L-1,respectively.The adverse effects of Diuron on Chironomus kiiensis were observed at different life stages such as hatching from eggs,development,emergence and reproduction.It was found that Diuron could inhibit the emergence ratio of both generations,with EC50 at 7.56 mg· L-1 for P generation and 5.24 mg· L-1 for F1 generation,implying that the tolerance to Diuron lowered in the secondary generation.The development rates decreased in the exposed groups for both generations,with EC50 at 5 mg·L-1 for P generation and 4.33 mg·L-1 for F1 one,indicating that the latter was more sensitive to Diuron.The sex ratios of Chironomus kiiensis were also influenced by Diuron,showing an inverse U-shaped concentration-effect curve for both generations.Besides,the hatching ratio of eggs spawned by P generation declined with the increasing concentrations,so did that by F1 generation;EC50 at 2.53 mg · L-1 for P generation and 10.4 mg·L-1 for F1 generation gave a clue that eggs spawned by F1 generation were of higher resistance to Diuron.Similarly,the fecundity of both generations was compromised by Diuron exposure,with EC50 at 1.99 mg·L-1 for P generation and 2.68 mg· L-1 for F1 generation.In conclusion,Diuron could produce adverse effects on Chironomus kiiensis at different life stages.Wherein,the influence of Diuron on emergence and development could be passed from P generation to F1 generation,and however,with regard to hatching ratio,eggs spawned by F1 generation were found to be more resistant to Diuron than those spawned by P generation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?