Red light-emitting diode on skin healing: an in vitro and in vivo experimental study
Tuany R Schmidt,Belkiss C Mármora,Fernanda T Brochado,Lucas Gonçalves,Paloma S Campos,Marcelo L Lamers,Aurigena A de Araújo,Caroline A C X de Medeiros,Susana B Ribeiro,Marco A T Martins,Emily F S Pilar,Manoela D Martins,Vivian P Wagner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2024.02.008
2024-11-08
Abstract:Background: The clinical advantages of light-emitting diode (LED) therapy in skin healing and its underlying mechanism remain subjects of ongoing debate. Objective: This study aims to explore the impact of LED therapy on normal skin keratinocytes (HaCaT) and in the repair of full-thickness dorsal wounds in Wistar rats. Methods: HaCaT cell viability (SRB assay) and migration (scratch assay) were assessed under LED therapy, comparing stress conditions (2.5% FBS) with sham irradiation and optimal conditions (10% FBS). In vivo, 50 rats with induced wounds were divided into Sham and LED (daily treatment) groups. Euthanasia occurred at 3, 5, 10, 14, and 21 days for clinical, morphological, oxidative stress (MDA, SOD, and GSH), and cytokine analyses (IL-1β, IL-10, TNF-α). Results: LED therapy significantly enhanced keratinocytes viability compared to sham irradiation, with minimal impact on cell migration. Clinical benefits were prominent on day 10, influencing inflammation progression and resolution on days 3 and 10. Re-epithelization remained unaffected. Reduced MDA and increased GSH levels were observed throughout, while SOD levels varied temporally. Notably, on day 10, LED significantly decreased IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α. Study limitations: Although translational, clinical trial confirmation of observed benefits is warranted. Conclusions: LED therapy expedites cutaneous healing in the experimental model, primarily modulating inflammation and enhancing antioxidant activity.