Abstract:This paper comprehensively uses Bayesian estimation,comparison of the second-order moment,impulse response,variance decomposition,historical decomposition and counterfactual simulation to arrive at the conclusions as follows:in the case of introduction of financial frictions and financial shocks,1) the loss of welfare under the interest rate (price) rule is greater than the quantity (money supply) rule.2) The quantity rule is better than the interest rate rule in cope with the effect of the negative financial shocks (financial crisis).3) Financial shocks play the primary role in explaining the volatility of output,investment,debt and employment under both the interest rate rule and the quantity rule,and they explain 40.54％ and 38.95％ of the variances of output respectively in China.4) The choice of monetary policy rule has a great influence on the economy of China,and the effect of it on inflation is greater than the effect on the output.5) In the case of the interest rate being not fully market-oriented and the existence of financial shocks,the People's Bank of China should adopt more quantity rules to regulate the economy.

Financial shocks, the choice of monetary policy rules and economic fluctuations in China