Abstract:Technology sharing among farmers has become common but controversial in recent years. To address it, we consider two farmers engaged in Cournot competition to investigate motivations of technology sharing and provide suggestions on contract design. One farmer (a licensor) has developed some technology and decides whether to share technology with the other farmer (a licensee). The licensee chooses whether to buy technology under a fixed-rate contract or a royalty-fee contract. We propose a technology sharing ratio between two farmers to characterize the degree of technology sharing. We find a win–win outcome for both farmers when the technology sharing ratio is higher than a threshold under the fixed-fee contract. While under the royalty-fee contract, the licensor only shares technology with an additional constraint that they have similar production costs. When the licensor can design contracts, he prefers the royalty-fee contract to the fixed-fee contract. We further interpret why the licensor may not benefit more under the two-part tariff contract than the fixed-fee or the royalty-fee contract. Moreover, we find that in supply chain settings, a win–win outcome for both farmers exists if and only if the technology sharing ratio is smaller than a threshold under the fixed-fee contract while technology sharing will not be realized under the royalty-fee contract. Finally, we show that the strategy of whether to share technology is robust to yield uncertainty, and both the licensor and licensee may benefit more from technology sharing because of yield uncertainty.

Contract and Revenue Distribution of University-Industry Technology Transfer

Impact of R&D Investments on Technology Transfer Contracts of Chinese Universities

A Control-Right-Based Model of Venture Companies' Optimal Financing Contracts

Intellectual Property Management During the Technology Transfer among Universities

How Can We Improve the Transformation Success Rate of Research Results in the Pharmaceutical Industry? The Game Theoretic Model of Technology Transfer Subjects

Evaluation of economic incentives for Chinese university patent transfers: Is increasing the inventor share rate more effective?

University'S Technology Transfer In Optimizing Regional Industry Structure

University Patent Technology Transfer in U.K. and its Referential Experiences

The Dilemma of Universities Intellectual Property Policy and Its Overcomes

University–Industry Technology Transfer: Empirical Findings from Chinese Industrial Firms

Realize the Commercial Value of the University's Technological Innovation——Operation Mechanism and Enlightenment of Technology Commercialization at University of Minnesota

The transfer of innovation capability from universities to enterprises in China: An institutional framework

A Study on the Mechanism of University-Industry Cooperation under Science and Technology Innovation:From the Perspective of Transaction Cost

Comparative Research on University Patent Technology Transfer Between China and Europe

How Does Product Innovation Affect the Performance of University-Industry Collaboration A Dynamic Knowledge Transfer Perspective

Successful Experience Analysis of University Technology Transfer Offices in Spain

Contract Design for Technology Sharing Between Two Farmers

Technology Transfer of Research-oriented University and Its Countermeasure

Critical factors for success in university–industry research projects

Exploring the Role of University-Run Enterprises in Technology Transfer from Chinese Universities

Does University-industry innovation community affect firms’ inventions? The mediating role of technology transfer