Abstract:The character of DNA replication is high fidelity. Precise and complete DNA replication is critical for the maintenance of genetic stability. Failures in these processes are major sources of genomic instability and will lead to cancer or other diseases. A wide variety of factors, such as DNA replication errors, spontaneous chemical reactions, reactive metabolic products, exogenous environmental agents or some anticancer therapeutics e.g. 5’-aza-2’-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR), can cause DNA damage (Wang et al, 2008; Zhu et al, 2004; Chai et al, 2008; Hoeijmakers, 2009). It is estimated that DNA damage occurs at a rate of 1,000 to 1,000,000 molecular lesions per cell per day (Lodish, 2004). In order to deal with problems under which the genome is vulnerable to injury or replication stress, eukaryotic cells elaborate a genomic maintenance apparatus, which is termed the DNA damage response (DDR) and replication stress response, including various checkpoint, signal-transduction and effectors system, which monitor problems and trigger a comprehensive cellular response pathway to prevent genome integrity. The extent of DNA damage depends on the type of environment to which it is exposed (Hoeijmakers, 2001). So, organisms must be capable of recognizing and dealing with each type of damage. It is not surprising that there are various different types of DNA damage response and repair systems. ATM and ATR are at the top of the DNA damage pathways. Although a cross-talk exists between the ATM and ATR pathways, ATM primarily seems to be involved in the detection of DNA double-strand breaks via Mre11/Rad50/Nbs1 complex (MRN), ATR is critical for cellular responses to a variety of DNA damage and stalled replication forks (Hefferin & Tomkinson, 2005). When these protein kinases activated, they eventually phosphorylate and modulate the downstream effectors (e.g., Chk1 and Chk2) and multiple additional substrates that initiate the cellular responses. Dynamic changes in protein post-translational modifications play a significant role in most cellular signalling pathways. More and more proteins were found in a variety of posttranslational modifications in response to DNA damage and genotoxic stress, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, sumolyation, methylation and ubiquitylation. Recent studies indicate that a crosstalk between multiple protein modifications exists, which collaboratively regulates signal transduction of DNA damage and genetic stresses.

The Roles of DNA Damage Response Machineries in Maintaining Genome Stability&Cellular Homeo-stasis

Regulators in the DNA Damage Response.

Role of Mitochondria in Nuclear DNA Damage Response

DNA damage checkpoint, damage repair, and genome stability.

Alterations of DNA damage repair in cancer: from mechanisms to applications

Connecting the Dots: From DNA Damage and Repair to Aging

DNA Checkpoint and Repair Factors Are Nuclear Sensors for Intracellular Organelle Stresses-Inflammations and Cancers Can Have High Genomic Risks.

DNA damage repair and cancer immunotherapy

Histone Post-Translational Modification and the DNA Damage Response

Recent advances in DNA damage repair mechanism

Targeting Mouse Double Minute 2: Current Concepts in DNA Damage Repair and Therapeutic Approaches in Cancer.

Telomere-related DNA damage response pathways in cancer therapy: prospective targets

Proteins from the DNA Damage Response: Regulation, Dysfunction, and Anticancer Strategies

When DNA-damage responses meet innate and adaptive immunity

The Dynamic Interplay in Chromatin Remodeling Factors Polycomb and Trithorax Proteins in Response to DNA Damage

DNA Damage Response and Immune Defense

DoUBLing up: ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteases in genome stability

New factors in mammalian DNA repair—the chromatin connection

Damage and Replication Stress Responses

DNA damage response defects in hematologic malignancies: mechanistic insights and therapeutic strategies

Roles of RecQ Family Helicases in the Maintenance of Genome Stability