Abstract:Quantifying treatment effect heterogeneity is a crucial task in many areas of causal inference, e.g. optimal treatment allocation and estimation of subgroup effects. We study the problem of estimating the level sets of the conditional average treatment effect (CATE), identified under the no-unmeasured-confounders assumption. Given a user-specified threshold, the goal is to estimate the set of all units for whom the treatment effect exceeds that threshold. For example, if the cutoff is zero, the estimand is the set of all units who would benefit from receiving treatment. Assigning treatment just to this set represents the optimal treatment rule that maximises the mean population outcome. Similarly, cutoffs greater than zero represent optimal rules under resource constraints. The level set estimator that we study follows the plug-in principle and consists of simply thresholding a good estimator of the CATE. While many CATE estimators have been recently proposed and analysed, how their properties relate to those of the corresponding level set estimators remains unclear. Our first goal is thus to fill this gap by deriving the asymptotic properties of level set estimators depending on which estimator of the CATE is used. Next, we identify a minimax optimal estimator in a model where the CATE, the propensity score and the outcome model are Holder-smooth of varying orders. We consider data generating processes that satisfy a margin condition governing the probability of observing units for whom the CATE is close to the threshold. We investigate the performance of the estimators in simulations and illustrate our methods on a dataset used to study the effects on mortality of laparoscopic vs open surgery in the treatment of various conditions of the colon.

CSTE Curve for Selection of the Optimal Treatment when Outcome is Binary

Estimation of Optimal Individualized Treatment Rules Using a Covariate-Specific Treatment Effect Curve With High-Dimensional Covariates

Selection of the Optimal Personalized Treatment from Multiple Treatments with Right-censored Multivariate Outcome Measures

Evaluating Markers for Selecting a Patient's Treatment.

A Probability Based Method for Selecting the Optimal Personalized Treatment from Multiple Treatments.

Learning Robust Treatment Rules for Censored Data

Decision Curve Analysis: a Technical Note

Optimal Marker-Strategy Clinical Trial Design to Detect Predictive Markers for Targeted Therapy

Optimal Statistical Inference for Individualized Treatment Effects in High-dimensional Models

Flexible Inference of Optimal Individualized Treatment Strategy in Covariate Adjusted Randomization with Multiple Covariates

Estimation of Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments in Observational Studies with a Binary Outcome

Identification of the Optimal Treatment Regimen in the Presence of Missing Covariates

Minimax optimal subgroup identification

On Estimation of Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Multiple Treatments for Survival Data-With Application to Colorectal Cancer Study

Estimating optimal treatment regimes in survival contexts using an instrumental variable

Multicategory Angle-Based Learning for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes With Censored Data

A New Covariate Selection Strategy for High Dimensional Data in Causal Effect Estimation with Multivariate Treatments

Are causal effect estimations enough for optimal recommendations under multitreatment scenarios?

Robust method for optimal treatment decision making based on survival data

Conditional and Unconditional Treatment Effects in Randomized Clinical Trials: Estimands, Estimation, and Interpretation

An Inverse Probability Weighted Regression Method that Accounts for Right-censoring for Causal Inference with Multiple Treatments and a Binary Outcome