Comparison of ultrasound and MRI for prenatal diagnosing placenta increta

Ru LIN,Jingtao LI,Yunyun REN,Guofu ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2017.08.008
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinical value of ultrasonography and MRI for prenatal diagnosing placenta increta.Methods:378 women with high risk of placenta increta were prenatal diagnosed by both ultrasonography and MRI in the retrospective study.The diagnostic results were compared by clinical and postpartum pathological diagnosis.Results:For ultrasonography,the sensitivity was 84.6 %,the specificity was 98.1%,the positive predictive value was 90.2%,and the negative predictive value was 96.8%.As for MRI,the sensitivity was 89.2%,the specificity was 92.7%,the positive predictive value was 71.6 %,and the negative predictive value was 97.6 %.Though there was no significant difference in sensitivity,there was significant difference in specificity between the two diagnosed methods.Conclusion:The both methods can provide meaningful imaging evidences for prenatal placenta increta diagnosis.Ultrasonography is helpful in reduction of misdiagnosis rate and avoidance of overdiagnosis for its high diagnostic accuracy,and MRI can help to reduce the missed diagnosis rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?