Abstract:[Objective] To evaluate the role of laparoscope assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the development of laparoscopic hysterectomy. [Methods] We conducted a retrospective analysis on 905 cases of hysterectomy, and divided the patients into four groups by different types of operations: group I:abdominal hysterectomy(AH, 383 cases); group II:Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy(LAVH, 215 cases);group III :Laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy/Classic Intrafascial Semm Hysterectomy(LSH/CISH, 188 cases); group IV: Total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH, 119 cases). We compared annually the number of cases in each group, the resulting complications, and cases that received laparoscopic hysterectomy but were switched to abdominal hysterectomy during laparoscopic operations from December 2002 to October 2005. We compared the operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery, the hospitalization days after the operations and the hospitalization expenses between AH group and LAVH group in the first year. Meanwhile, we repeated the same comparisons in the last year. [Results] LAVH were first developed, and declined after the other laparoscopy types were conducted. There was no complication and no type switching during laparoscopy in LAVH group while other operating types had. Group Ⅱ has longer operation time, larger blood loss during operation, higher expenses, and shorter anus exhaust recovery time after operation than those in groupⅠduring the first year, and other comparisons showed no difference. The operation time in groupⅡ and the blood loss in group Ⅳ did not differ from that in groupⅠ during the last year, each laparoscopy group need higher expenses than that in groupⅠ, and others comparison between each laparoscopy group and groupⅠsuggests that laparoscopy is better. There is no difference about hospitalization expenses among each laparoscopy group, and in others comparison group Ⅲ are better than groupⅡ, and group Ⅳ does not differ from groupⅡexcept operation time, which is short in group Ⅳ. [Conclusions] LAVH is more preferable than others to initiate laparoscopic hysterectomy since it has a high success rate with low complications. Technically, LAVH helps surgeons familiarize the main points in performing laparoscopic hysterectomy, and thus extends the application of it.

Analysis of three kinds of surgery for large total hysterectomy

Clinical Study on Different Operation Procedure for Hysterectomy

Analysis of 216 Cases of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Clinical Investigation of Different Pathway of Hysterectomies

Clinical Analysis of 130 Cases of Transvaginal Hysterectomy for Non-prolapsed Uterus

Comparison of hysterectomy via three routes treating endometriosis

Clinical Analysis of Four Kinds of Laparoscopic Hysterectomies

Study on the Effects of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

[Clinical Comparison of Transvaginal Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy].

Comparative analysis of clinical long and short term complications of two kinds of laparoscopic hysterectomy

Clinical Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy for Patients with Malignant Uterine Tumors:Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy

Clinical comparison of laparoscopic total hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Efficacy of three approaches for hysterectomy in patients with uterine myoma

Comparative Analysis Between Laparoscopic Operation and Laparotomy in Treating Early Stage of Cervical and Endometrial Carcinomas

Abdominal hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy in cases of enlarged uterine size

Role of laparoscope assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the development of laparoscopic gysterectomy

Comparison of urinary system affected by totally laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy

Clinical comparative analysis of laparoscopic and transabdominal radical hysterectomy

Laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy for III-IV endometriosis

Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Routine Surgical Instruments and Suturing Ligation of the Uterine Vessels:Report of 56 Cases

Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Excision of Large Hysteromyoma in 63 Patients