Abstract:Abstract Aims For patients with diabetes, the European guidelines updated the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction recommendations using diabetes-specific models with age-specific cut-offs, whereas American guidelines still advise models derived from the general population. We aimed to compare the performance of four cardiovascular risk models in diabetes populations. Methods and results Patients with diabetes from the CHERRY study, an electronic health records-based cohort study in China, were identified. Five-year CVD risk was calculated using original and recalibrated diabetes-specific models [Action in Diabetes and Vascular disease: PreterAx and diamicroN-MR Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) and the Hong Kong cardiovascular risk model (HK)] and general population-based models [Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) and Prediction for Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease Risk in China (China-PAR)]. During a median 5.8-year follow-up, 46 558 patients had 2605 CVD events. C-statistics were 0.711 [95% confidence interval: 0.693–0.729] for ADVANCE and 0.701 (0.683–0.719) for HK in men, and 0.742 (0.725–0.759) and 0.732 (0.718–0.747) in women. C-statistics were worse in two general population-based models. Recalibrated ADVANCE underestimated risk by 1.2% and 16.8% in men and women, whereas PCE underestimated risk by 41.9% and 24.2% in men and women. With the age-specific cut-offs, the overlap of the high-risk patients selected by every model pair ranged from only 22.6% to 51.2%. When utilizing the fixed cut-off at 5%, the recalibrated ADVANCE selected similar high-risk patients in men (7400) as compared to the age-specific cut-offs (7102), whereas age-specific cut-offs exhibited a reduction in the selection of high-risk patients in women (2646 under age-specific cut-offs vs. 3647 under fixed cut-off). Conclusion Diabetes-specific CVD risk prediction models showed better discrimination for patients with diabetes. High-risk patients selected by different models varied significantly. Age-specific cut-offs selected fewer patients at high CVD risk especially in women. Lay summary This large electronic health records-based real-world study indicated that the diabetes-specific cardiovascular risk models had better discriminative abilities than the models derived from the general population in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes. Current guidelines-recommended models, i.e. ADVANCE, PCE, and China-PAR, selected significantly different high-risk groups with various observed cardiovascular risks, indicating the potential considerable misclassification of risk stratification in clinical decision-making for preventive interventions.Compared with the fixed cut-off, the influence of the age-specific cut-offs for high risk of cardiovascular disease was different in men and women: age-specific cut-offs selected ∼27% fewer high-risk patients in women but similar in men.

Comparing the risk assessment models of type 2 diabetes mellitus on the basis of environmental and genetic risk factors

Cardiovascular disease risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes:verification in Chinese patients

Comparative study on risk prediction model of type 2 diabetes based on machine learning theory: a cross-sectional study

Application of Three Statistical Models for Predicting the Risk of Diabetes

A Risk Assessment Model for Type 2 Diabetes in Chinese

Machine Learning Models in Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction: Results from a Cross-sectional Retrospective Study in Chinese Adults

Comparing the accuracy of four machine learning models in predicting type 2 diabetes onset within the Chinese population: a retrospective study

Genetic Risk Score Increased Discriminant Efficiency of Predictive Models for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Using Machine Learning: Cohort Study.

Validity Evaluation of Recently Published Diabetes Risk Scoring Models in a General Chinese Population

Development and validation of a prediction model estimating the 10-year risk for type 2 diabetes in China

The risk predication of type 2 diabetes among rural residents with impaired glucose regulation

Predicting Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Genetic Risk Models on the Basis of Established Genome-wide Association Markers: A Systematic Review

Comparison of three data mining models for predicting diabetes or prediabetes by risk factors

Predicting the risk of subclinical atherosclerosis based on interpretable machine models in a Chinese T2DM population

A risk prediction model for type 2 diabetes mellitus complicated with retinopathy based on machine learning and its application in health management

Risk Prediction Models for Incident Type 2 Diabetes in Chinese People with Intermediate Hyperglycemia: a Systematic Literature Review and External Validation Study

An early prediction model for type 2 diabetes mellitus based on genetic variants and nongenetic risk factors in a Han Chinese cohort

Nonlaboratory-Based Risk Assessment Model for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Screening in Chinese Rural Population: A Joint Bagging-Boosting Model.

Combined Effects of 19 Common Variations on Type 2 Diabetes in Chinese: Results from Two Community-Based Studies

Validation and comparison of cardiovascular risk prediction equations in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes

Establishment of Clinical Prediction Model Based on the Study of Risk Factors of Stroke in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.