Impact of integrated intervention measures on the compliance of ventilator care bundles by medical staff and the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia of patients in general intensive care unit

Ying LI,Wen XU,Wei GE,Xiao-qin CAO,Li-li MA,Yan-lan WU,Yi WANG,Shan-hong FAN
DOI: https://doi.org/10.11816/cn.ni.2017-170491
2017-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To intervene patients on mechanical ventilation in general intensive care unit (ICU) with ventilator care bundles (VCB), and improve the compliance of patients receiving VCB by carrying out some integrated intervention measures on medical staff in the ICU, so as to reduce the incidence of ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP).METHODS We adopted cluster sampling method, and selected 37 patients in ICU from May to Jul.2015 as control group, and 151 patients from Sept.2015 to Aug.2016 as intervention group, who were all treated with mechanical ventilation(MV) for more than 48 hours.After the baseline survey, questionnaire was used to find out the causes of the medical staff who did not follow the VCB in general ICU.The compliance of VCB and incidence of VAP between patients who were treated with mechanical ventilation(MV) for more than 48 hours in the two groups were compared, and the effect of the intervention was evaluated.RESULTS Only 43.5% of medical staff in the ICU considered that VAP was preventable.Awareness rates of prevention and control measures of VAP were from 21.7% to 52.2%.All medical staff in the ICU considered that the complicated form which needed to be completed was the main reason why the VCB was not implemented.Mechanical ventilation use of control group and intervention group were 26.8% and 28.1%, and the difference was not significant.The compliance rate of the VCB was higher in intervention group(76.5%) than that in control group(19.2%).The compli ance rate of elevation of bedhead with 30° to 45°, daily evaluation of medical condition with no ventilator, oral care with chlorhexidine, cuff pressure≥20cmH2O and hand hygiene in intervention group were all higher than those in control group, and the differences were significant (P<0.05).CONCLUSION Awareness rates of prevention and control measures of VAP and the standard compliance rate of VCB were both low in ICU medical staff.Integrated intervention measures can improve the standard compliance of patients receiving VCB, and reduce the incidence of VAP, but there is no obviously decrease in ventilator use.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?