Abstract:Background: The use of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in medical practice has increased rapidly over the last decades. PICC provides venous access for patients requiring prolonged therapy and infusion of caustic solutions. Despite of these benefits, PICC, as an invasive technology, is associated with many complications. Studies reported that the incidence of PICC-related complication ranged from 25% to 50%. It is known that PICC is more effective and safe than other prolonged venous infusion technologies including central venous catheters (CVC) and venous port access (VPA). So professionals need to compare the effectiveness and safety between PICC, CVC and VPA when they provide venous access for patients. Objective: To overview the systematic review/meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of peripherally inserted central catheters technology. Methods: PICO-D was adopted to identify the search strategy. Patients (P) included participants with venous access of PICC, CVC or VPA, and older than 18 years. Interventions (I) referred to PICC and compares referred to CVC or VPA. The outcomes of effectiveness were insertion success rate and dwelling time. The outcomes of safety were incidence of complications (catheter-related infection, catheter-related venous thrombosis, phlebitis, occlusion, and so on) during insertion and maintenance. Databases including the Cochrane Library (issue 10, 2015), Medline, EMBASE, CNKI, CMB, WANFANG and VIP from inception to October, 2015. Literature screening and appraisal, data extracting were done by two reviewers. AMSTAR tool and GRADE system were used to assess the methodological quality of included literatures and quality of evidence according to outcomes. Results: 15 articles met the inclusion criteria. 13 articles were published after 2010. 14 articles assessed the methodological quality of included studies, and 8 systematic reviews adopted Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. The results of AMSTAR assessment showed that only 6 systematic reviews were high quality and the most defects were as following: not providing a SR protocol, not including unpublished literatures, not listing included and excluded studies and not stating conflict of interest. The results of quality of evidence assessment for 17 outcomes from systematic reviews suggested that the quality of evidence of 6 outcomes were middle, and others were low or very low. Discussion/Conclusion: The methodological quality of included literatures is not high and the quality of evidence of outcomes is most low. As a whole, there is not enough evidence to support that PICC is more effective than CVC and VPA. The risk of complications for PICC is lower than CVC and VPA during insertion. But the risk of complications for PICC is higher than CVC and VPA during maintaining. Due to limitation of quality and quantity of included systematic reviews, the conclusions need more high quality studies to support.

Meta-analysis of risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-associated infections

Related factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated infections and prevention measures

The incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter-related infection among cancer patients

Incidence and Risk Factors of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related Complications in Patients with Different Disease Types

A Comprehensive Intervention Program on the Long-Term Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters.

Influences and Countermeasures of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in ICU

Peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients: a prospective study of over 50,000 catheter days

Incidence and Risk Factors of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter-related Complications in Patients with Diabetes: A Retrospective Study

The incidence and related factors of PICC catheter misplacement

Risk factors for skin injuries in cancer patients with peripherally inserted central catheter: A prospective multicenter cohort study

Effects of Peripherally inserted Central Catheter (PICC) materials and designs on reduction of PICC-related complications: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Case-control Study of Risk Factors of Central Venous Catheter Tip Bacterial Colonization

Elderly cancer patients PICC-related infections factors

The research of peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in 218 pediatric patients and nursing countermeasures

ANALYSIS OF THE RISK FACTORS OF CATHETER-RELATED NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

Targeted monitoring and risk factors of PICC related bloodstream infections in leukemia patients

Nomogram Predicted Risk of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Related Thrombosis

Nursing research in peripherally inserted central catheter related infection in patients with tumor

Risk factors of central catheter bloodstream infections in intensive care units: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk factors for medical adhesive-related skin injury at the site of peripherally inserted central venous catheter placement in patients with cancer: a single-centre prospective study from China

Evaluation on Effectiveness and Safety of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Technology: an Overview of Systematic Review