Impact of serum uric acid levels on the clinical prognosis and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome and hypertension after percutaneous coronary intervention: a prospective cohort study
Shiyu Zhang,Xin Liu,Bingxue Song,Haichu Yu,Xiaodong Zhang,Yanming Shao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052031
IF: 3.006
2022-01-01
BMJ Open
Abstract:Objective The impact of serum uric acid (sUA) levels on the clinical prognosis and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and hypertension after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not fully clear. This study aimed to assess the association among sUA levels, clinical prognosis and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with ACS and hypertension after PCI. Design In this prospective cohort study, we followed-up patients with ACS and hypertension after PCI for 1 year to explore the risk factors for 1 year total major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and multivessel coronary artery disease, the dose-effect relationship among sUA levels, MACEs and severity of coronary artery disease and correlation between sUA levels and severity of coronary artery disease (Gensini score). Setting/patients Several Chinese internists followed-up 422 patients who were diagnosed with ACS and hypertension after PCI in a large tertiary hospital of Qingdao during the period from 1 June 2019 to 1 December 2019. Outcome measures One-year follow-up MACEs results and coronary angiography results. Results In the coronary angiography results, multivessel coronary artery disease (28.5% vs 21.4%, p=0.006) and non-culprit lesion vascular occlusion (11.7% vs 5.3%, p=0.042) were more common in the hyperuricaemia group, and the Gensini score (26.69±13.46 vs 17.66±10.57, p<0.001) was also higher. In the results of 1-year MACEs, the incidence of all-cause mortality (3.5% vs 2.5%, p=0.037), PCI or coronary artery bypass grafting therapy due to myocardial infarction or angina pectoris (15.1% vs 7.6%, p=0.027), medication conservative therapy in hospital due to myocardial infarction or angina pectoris (12.9% vs 6.7%, p=0.041) and total MACEs (31.8% vs 16.9%, p=0.001) were higher in patients with hyperuricaemia. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis models showed that hyperuricaemia was still an independent risk factor for total MACEs within 1 year (OR=2.618, 95% CI 1.656 to 4.139, p<0.001; OR=1.920, 95% CI 1.158 to 3.183, p=0.011, respectively) and multivessel coronary artery disease (OR=2.140, 95% CI 1.371 to 3.342, p=0.001; OR=1.688, 95% CI 1.051 to 2.710, p=0.030, respectively) after adjusting for confounding factors. The severity of coronary artery disease (non-culprit lesion vascular occlusion (4.7% vs 8.4% vs 9.6% vs 16.2%, p=0.041); multivessel coronary artery disease (17.9% vs 22.4% vs 29.8% vs 35.2%, p=0.022); Gensini score (16.96±10.35 vs 19.31±10.63 vs 26.12±11.48 vs 33.33±14.01, p<0.001)) and the incidence of total MACEs (13.2% vs 14.2% vs 34.6% vs 41%, p<0.001) increased significantly with the sUA levels increasing. Further, the Gensini score was positively correlated with uric acid levels (r=0.515, p<0.001). Conclusions Hyperuricaemia is an independent risk factor for 1-year total MACEs and multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ACS and hypertension after PCI.
medicine, general & internal