The male gamete is not a somatic cell--the possible meaning of varying sperm RNA levels.
A. Amaral,J. Ramalho‐Santos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4715
2013-01-10
Antioxidants and Redox Signaling
Abstract:Dear Editor: We are writing to comment on the article by Otasevic et al. (7). In this work, Otasevic and colleagues studied the effects of incubating human sperm with M40403, a cell permeable and low molecular weight superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimic, which selectively removes cellular superoxide anion. This is certainly a worthy goal. In the last years, various studies have focused on the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and oxidative stress in sperm, as well as on the possibility of using antioxidant therapy in the treatment of male infertility [for a recent review see (2)]. It seems well established that small, regulated amounts of ROS are critical for the ability of sperm to achieve fertilization, but that increased and uncontrolled ROS production may result in compromised male fertility. Although a variety of antioxidant supplements have been shown to positively influence sperm quality, a beneficial effect of such therapies in male infertility treatment has not been convincingly recognized (8). According to the study of Otasevic et al. (7), incubation of sperm with M40403 is able to rescue sperm from the negative effects of a 3-h in vitro incubation in the Tyrode’s medium. The parameters evaluated included sperm motility, mitochondrial functionality (both of which intimately related to sperm function), as well as, and more crucially, the mRNA levels of various mitochondrial proteins and antioxidant enzymes. One of the characteristics one has to take into account when studying sperm is that sperm is a terminally differentiated cell that cannot replicate/be maintained in a cell culture. For this reason, most of sperm studies are performed a few hours after sample collection, as incubating sperm in the culture medium for long periods will be detrimental. Interestingly though, we have recently shown that good quality sperm may be maintained alive and motile for various days (1), provided that optimal conditions are used. The more abrupt reduction in sperm motility observed in the Otasevic et al. (7) study can be explained by the fact that they did not include serum albumin in their culture medium (as they wanted to use noncapacitating conditions), and thus sperm may have started to aggregate to each other during the 3-h period. Regardless, cellular modifications might also have occurred, including the production of intracellular ROS, which might have affected sperm quality during this period of time. M40403, by scavenging superoxide anion, was able to rescue sperm motility and mitochondrial functionality, most probably by avoiding lipid peroxidation, similarly to what happens when sperm is incubated with SOD (5). We have no major qualms with these data. However, the authors of the article reasoned that M40403 would stimulate an increase in the transcript levels of different mitochondrial proteins (both nuclearand mitochondrialencoded) and antioxidant enzymes. This aspect deserves further attention. Such an explanation would be correct if sperm were similar to somatic cells. However, sperm are transcriptionally silent cells (at least for nuclear-encoded proteins), due to the high condensation architecture of their chromatin, a fact that anyone knowledgeable in the field is aware of. In fact, during spermiogenesis (the last and haploid phase of spermatogenesis), histones are gradually replaced by small, highly basic proteins called protamines, resulting in nuclear compaction [for a review see (6)]. Although ejaculated sperm do possess RNAs with possible clinical relevance [for a recent review see (3)], the general consensus in the field is that ejaculated sperm have no nuclear transcription activity, and that these RNAs are leftovers from the process of spermatogenesis, often residing in cytoplasmic remnants that are not immediately visible by conventional techniques. Thus, the altered transcript levels observed by Otasevic and coworkers (7) require reinterpretation. Although the authors correctly control for possible somatic cell contamination, the decreased nuclear-encoded transcript levels observed in untreated sperm maintained 3 h in the Tyrode’s medium could have resulted from RNA degradation. Such degradation seems to be prevented when the SOD mimic is incorporated in the culture medium. As for the increased levels of transcripts observed in the SOD mimic situation when compared to the control, the only plausible explanation would rely on the fact that sperm samples, notably human clinical samples, are very heterogeneous. Thus, the