Abstract:Objectives. Management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) encompasses a broad spectrum of practices, posing considerable complexity and variability. While guidelines have been established to augment the management quality of CCS, notable disparities persist across their recommendations. This study strives to scrutinize, compare, and reconcile these guideline recommendations pertaining to the diagnosis, treatment, and management of CCS patients. Our goal is to align these recommendations with contemporary clinical practices, thus laying a robust foundation for their pragmatic application in clinical settings. Methods. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database, and Chinese Biological Medicine Database. The timeframe for this search spanned from their inception up to May 30, 2022, aiming to collate all published guidelines relevant to CCS. Subsequently, two independent reviewers undertook the task of appraising the quality of these guidelines by utilizing the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. Results. The search yielded a total of 10,699 citations. Following a thorough evaluation, fourteen clinical practice guidelines and four consensus statements, each offering specific recommendations for CCS, were selected. The quality of these guidelines showcased a broad spectrum of variation. The domain of “presentation clarity” received the highest accolades, while “applicability” languished at the lower end of the scoring spectrum. On average, the guidelines attained a quality score denoting sufficiency. Furthermore, recommendations across different guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and management of CCS displayed a striking level of divergence. Conclusion. The landscape of published CCS guidelines is marked by extensive variations in scope, quality, and recommendations. Hence, there is a compelling need for collaborative efforts amongst multidisciplinary professionals to forge comprehensive, higher-quality evidence-based guidelines; such a concerted approach is paramount to enhance treatment efficacy and health outcomes for patients grappling with CCS.

CSRM specifications for developing guideline consensus

International standard of Traditional Chinese Medicine techniques: clinical guidelines for dysmenorrhea (2022)

Chinese Society of Allergy and Chinese Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline for Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Technical specification of expert consensus statement in developing clinical practice guidelines of traditional Chinese medicine

A Question to the 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Esophageal Ambulatory Reflux Monitoring in Chinese Adults

CSRM guideline for the use of ovulation induction drug

How Well Did the Consensus Methods Apply in the Guideline Development of Traditional Chinese Medicine: a Web-Based Survey in China

CSRM guidelines for next generation sequencing-based PGD/PGS

Reflections on development of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists clinical practice guidelines and clinical consensus methodology for development of Chinese guidelines in obstetrics and gynecology

Guideline for [clinical Guidelines Constitution/Amendment] in China.

American, European, and Chinese Practice Guidelines or Consensuses of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: a Comparative Analysis

Improving the quality of clinical practice guidelines/consensus reports to promote the high-quality development of medical periodicals

A Protocol for Developing Chinese Clinical Practice Guidelines of Hypertension

Status Quo and Reflections of Development of Integrative Coronary Heart Disease Clinical Practice Guidelines

Diagnosis, Treatment, and Management for Chronic Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Consensus Statements

Clinical practice guideline in China: current status and thoughts

The Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines in China: a Systematic Assessment.

Laying equal stress on research and clinical guidelines to promote the development of breast surgery in China

Development and Preliminary Verification of the Evaluation System for Clinical Practice Guidelines in China

To establish high-quality clinical practice guidelines and promote the standardization of diagnosis and treatment of breast disease in China