ACEI and ARB for Congestive Heart Failure: A Systematic Review

WU Hao,ZHAI Suo-di
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2005.03.005
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) on the left ventricular texture parameters, blood kinetics parameters, degree of cardiac function and rate of side effects of patients with heart failure when compared to angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Methods We searched MEDLINE (19662004), EMBASE (19892000), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2004), IPA (19702004), and Chinese Biomedicine Database (19802003). The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment and loss of follow up was evaluated and meta analysis was performd by RevMan 4.2 software. Results Eighteen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The meta analysis of efficacy didnt show statistical significance when comparing the pooled effect size of left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), cardiac output (CO), heart rate (HR), degree of cardiac function. The pooled RR rate of side effects was 2 17, 95%CI 1 53 to 3 07, P 0 000 01 . Conclusions No evidence shows significant difference of ACEI group from ARB group in the improvement of cardiac function and left ventricle remodeling. The rate of side effects of ACEI is statistically higher than that of ARB.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?