A Comparative Research on the International Common Surgery and Operation Classification System

Puwo Ci,Aimin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2566.2015.09.012
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objectives To provide policy evidence to national statistic of health intervention information by investigating major operation and procedure classification systems worldwide. Methods The study compared the features,coding rules and classification axis of ICD-10-PCS,ICHI and CCHI,and interpreted the three classifications and ICD-9-CM3 from the aspects of objectives,applications,clinical using and operative convenience. Results The ICD-10-PCS, ICHI and ICD-9-CM3 are all classification systems based on clinical interventions. ICD-10-PCS covered a wide range compare with the other two systems. The context of ICHI is basic and junior. The clinical application of ICD-9-CM3 is strong compared with the other two systems. Besides, the objective of CCHI is for health intervention charge. Conclusions ICD-9-CM3 should be used continually for collection health intervention information before there would be a classification consistently used around the world. If the tool of information collection changes without preparation, there would be disruption of information on using historical data. The result of the study did not recommend using CCHI to collection clinical health intervention data.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?