Analysis of HPV-DNA infection status and its subtype distribution of women in Baoji, China
Jun Li,Haijing Xue,Lingxia Feng,Pingxia Shi,Xing Nan,Yiyu Wang,Yue Yin,Guoqing Wang,Xiaofei Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2017.22.032
2017-01-01
Journal of Modern Oncology
Abstract:Objective:To investigate infection status and type distribution of human papillomavirus (HPV)in women in Baoji,China.Methods:Twenty-three HPV genotypes were analyzed by PCR and reverse dot blot hybrid-ization technique.Results:The total,high risk,low risk,and mixed high and low risk HPV infection rates were 35.92%,24.27%,9.21% and 2.44% respectively.The rates of single,single high risk and multiple subtype of HPV were 28.54%,20.51% and 3.76% respectively.HPV infection rate was higher for women under 20 year old and o-ver 60 year old group and highest in above 60 years old age group.The main common HPV subtypes were 16,6,58, 11,53,52 in total,16,6,58,11,53,52 in single,and 16,11,6,58,51,53 in multiple subtype infection and with infec-tion rates 71.58%,60.47% and 66.86% in self-group HPV infection respectively.The main common HPV sub-types of different age groups,≤20 were 58,6,39,11,16,56,21 ~ 30 were 6,16,11,52,58,39,31 ~ 40 were 16,6, 58,11,52,53,41 ~ 50 were 16,6,58,11,52,51,51 ~ 60 were 16,6,53,11,58,42,> 60 were 16,6,58,11,53,56 types,and accounted for 76.86%,74.12%,71.33%,65.65%,60.92% and 73.57% in self group infection respec-tively.The double infection of HPV was most common (5.67%)in all multiple infections,and accounted for 76.89%in all multiple infections.The rates of HPV16 subtype of total,single and multiple infection were 20.04%,24.34%and 13.06% in self-group infection respectively.Conclusion:The HPV infection rate of women in Baoji region of Shaanxi province is higher especially in the over 60 years of age group and the most common HPV high and low risksubtypes are 16,58,53,52,39,56 and 6,11.The subtype distribution of HPV were special characteristic in different age groups.The infection rates of total,high risk,low risk and high-low-risk were significant different in different age groups.