Abstract:Abstract Background Sublobar resection is a potential alternative to lobectomy for elderly patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer, with better short term outcomes and similar oncological outcomes. We aimed to compare sublobar resection and lobectomy in patients with clinical stage T1N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer aged 70 years or older. Methods We did this prospective, open label, randomised, controlled, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial (STEPS; registered with the Chinese Thoracic Oncology Group, number CTON1504) comparing sublobar resection and lobectomy for treatment of elderly patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Patients were aged 70 years or older, with preoperative thoracic CT showing suspected peripheral non-small-cell lung cancer, clinical stage IA, consolidation to maximum tumour diameter ratio of 0·5 or higher, and were eligible for sublobar resection with sufficient margin. Intraoperative eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed invasive non-small-cell lung cancer, pathological exclusion of suspected lymph node involvement, and feasibility of sublobar resection in terms of surgical margin requirement. Patients gave informed consent, completed 4-year mortality index and comprehensive geriatric assessment if necessary, and had both forced expiratory volume in 1 s and diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide of 50% or more in pulmonary function tests. Patients were excluded if they had a previous history of thoracic surgery and malignant tumour history within the past 5 years. We expect a total of 339 patients to be randomly assigned to the two treatment groups and participants will be followed-up every 6 months for 3 years. The primary outcome is 3-year disease-free survival (with a non-inferiority margin of 15%). The study will develop in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Committee approval (Peking University Institutional Review Board) was obtained on Oct 30, 2014, before registration (reference number IRB00001052-13053). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials, number NCT02360761. Findings As of Jan 29, 2016, 66 patients have been registered to the study; the accrual is slower than anticipated. One patient receiving sublobar resection died of a surgical complication. Interpretation To our knowledge, the present study is the only prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial to compare sublobar resection and lobectomy for elderly patients (≥70 years) with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Funding Medtronic Inc.

Comparison of Curative Effect between Sublobar Resection and Lobectomy on the Elderly with Ground-glass Opacities

Sublobar Resection Is Associated With Better Perioperative Outcomes In Elderly Patients With Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Surgical Management and Outcomes of Multifocal Ground-Glass Opacities in Elderly Patients

Effectiveness And Safety Of Lobectomy And Sublobar Dissection In Chinese Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Observational Study.

Optimizing Lung Cancer Surgery in the Elderly: Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Aged 80 and Above.

Prognosis analysis of lobectomy and sublobar resection in patients ≥75 years old with pathological stage I invasive lung adenocarcinoma of ≤3 cm: a propensity score matching-based analysis

Sublobectomy versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly.

Comparative Effectiveness of Lobectomy, Segmentectomy, and Wedge Resection for Pathological Stage I Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: A Population-Based Study.

Effectiveness and Safety of Systematic and Selective Lymphadenectomies in Chinese Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Received Sublobar Resection.

Analysis of long-term survival of high-risk elderly patients with stage Ⅰ NSCLC underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy and sublobar resection

Comparison of surgical outcomes and prognosis between wedge resection and simple Segmentectomy for GGO diameter between 2 cm and 3 cm in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter and propensity score matching analysis

Comparison between sublobar resection and lobectomy for the surgical treatment of elderly patients with early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (STEPS): an open label, multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 clinical trial

Segmentectomy and Wedge Resection for Elderly Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Surgical Outcomes of Lobectomy Versus Limited Resection for Clinical Stage I Ground-Glass Opacity Lung Adenocarcinoma 2 Centimeters or Smaller

Sublobar Resections for Small-Sized Stage Ia Lung Adenocarcinoma: a Sino-Japanese Multicenter Study

Survival and Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of the Elderly NSCLC in China: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Sublobectomy Versus Lobectomy for Long-Term Survival Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with a Tumor Size ≤2 Cm Accompanied by Visceral Pleural Invasion: a SEER Population-Based Study

Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer: an appropriate choice in elderly patients?

Sublobar resection versus lobectomy in Surgical Treatment of Elderly Patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (STEPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Sublobar Resection for Pulmonary Aspergilloma: A Safe Alternative to Lobectomy

Comparative analysis of the clinical effects of different thoracoscopic resection in the treatment of Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer