Investigation on Misdiagnosis of Brucellosis Cases in Suzhou City and a Questionnaire Survey
Xu Huayu,Gan Jianhe,Zhao Weifeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4255.2019.12.014
2019-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze the subjective and objective misdiagnostic reasons of brucellosis in Suzhou City. Methods The clinical data of inpatients with brucellosis from the department of infectious diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from 2016 to 2018 were collected. The main onset methods, the first consultation department, the diagnosis and treatment process, and the main diagnosis were analyzed. Simultaneously, a questionnaire survey was conducted among doctors from different departments in Suzhou City. To investigate the knowledge and diagnosis of brucellosis by electronic questionnaire, and analyze the results. Results Totally 24 brucellosis cases were collected. Fever (13 cases, 54.17％), lumbago/arthralgia (6 cases, 25.00％) or both (3 cases, 12.50％) were the main initial symptoms, while a patient with fever, arthralgia and orchitis (1 case, 4.17％) and another with purpura (1 case, 4.17％ ) were also admitted. The 24 patients were distributed among 10 different departments, in which the department of infectious diseases (6 cases, 25.00％) and orthopedics (5 cases, 20.83％) dominated. Brucellosis was considered in only 2 patients (8.33％) before pathogen results, and the main suspected diagnosis were malignant hematopathy/lymphoma (7 cases, 29.17％), sepsis (5 cases, 20.83％), and tuberculosis (4 cases, 16.67％). Totally 124 questionnaires were collected and analyzed. We divided them into 2 groups: department of infectious diseases (52 / 124, 41.94％) and other departments (72/124, 58.06％). The proportion of answer "yes" for the question Suzhou is the epidemic area of brucellosis, question whether brucellosis is considered in suspected patients, question whether the epidemiology is collected and question how and where to conduct the serological test was 38.71％ (48/124), 32.26％ (40/124), 53.23％ (66/124) and 29.84％ (37/124), respectively. The positive answer in the department of infectious diseases (24/52, 46.15％) was significantly higher than those of others (16/72, 22.22％,χ2 = 7.913, P < 0.05). The respondents thought the serological test could not be conducted, because of that the non-pasture doctors were not familiar with the test procedure, which was complex (93/124, 75.00％) and the disease was not considered (85/124, 68.55％). And the respondents thought measures helpful to reduce misdiagnosis should include setting up serological test or simplifying the procedure (96/124, 77.42％), massed learning organized by related administrations (95/124, 76.61％) and learning by books, papers and classes (72/124, 58.06％). Conclusion There is obvious clinical misdiagnosis of brucellosis in Suzhou City, which may be caused by Suzhou doctors not paying enough attention to brucellosis, being unfamiliar with the inspection process and complicated inspection process.