Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of 12 Chinese Patent Medicines for Treating Primary Osteoporosis Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Qinglin Peng,Jie Han,Ruiqi Wu,Yukun Wu,Feng Chen,Yu Lai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578x241271671
IF: 1.496
2024-08-01
Natural Product Communications
Abstract:Objective: To elucidate the effectiveness and safety of different traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) for treating primary osteoporosis (POP) using network meta-analysis. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese patent medicine (CPM) combined with conventional Western medicine for POP treatment. From March 5, 2004, to March 5, 2024, electronic databases such as the Cochrane Library, VIP, PubMed, Embase, CBM, Wanfang, CNKI, and Web of Science were comprehensively searched. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this systematic review. After screening and data extraction, the Cochrane risk of bias evaluation tool was utilized to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Stata 15.1 was utilized to synthesize the data. Results: In total, 44 studies involving 4859 patients were included. There were 2577 patients in the treatment group and 2282 in the control group, with 12 types of CPMs. Qing'e Pill, in combination with conventional treatment, significantly improved the total effective rate [relative risk (RR) = 2.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.32, 5.00)]. In combination with conventional treatment, Liuwei Dihuang Pill significantly increased the bone mass density (BMD) of the lumbar spine [WMD = 0.17, 95% CI (0.05, 0.28)] and femoral neck [WMD = 0.23, 95% CI (0.11, 0.35)]. Furthermore, Hugu capsules effectively decreased the VAS score [WMD = −2.48, 95% CI (−3.85, −1.11)]. The presence of the genus Gusongbao markedly decreased the serum ALP concentration [WMD = −15.67, 95% CI (−32.73, 1.39)]. In all studies, no serious adverse reactions were noted, with most studies suggesting only mild gastrointestinal reactions. Conclusions: CPM and conventional treatment combo enhances POP therapy; each CPM offers unique benefits. More high-quality RCTs needed for conclusions. Meds tailored to patient traits in clinics.
chemistry, medicinal,food science & technology