Clinical Pathological Features of Gray Matter Heterotopias

Hui LENG,Jing FU,Le LIANG,Ying LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-070X.2016.06.008
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the objective basis for the pathological diagnosis of gray matter heterotopia. Methods The pathological and clinical data of 17 cases of gray matter heterotopia resection were analyzed, and supplemented by immunohistochemical method, the number and types of neurons in the gray matter heterotopia were counted. Results Only 3 cases of gray matter heterotopias were diagnosed by MRI before surgery in this group. The remaining 14 cases (82.4%, 14/17) were all diagnosed by microscopic diagnosis. There are three types of gross performance: (1) isolated gray matter nodule in white matter. (2) Gray matter heterotopia is located in the subcortical and show nodular or tongue connected to the cortex. (3) Cerebral cortical is thickening. The boundary is not clear between gray matter and white matter. Microscopically, the boundary of some heterotopic gray matter is clear,neuronal arrangement disorder within the heterotopic gray matter,polarity of dendrite and axon are disorder. There isn't normal cortical layer structure. Neurons show degenerative changes, necrosis and immature forms. Immunohistochemistry GFAP can show the outline of some gray matter heterotopic nodules. NeuN and Map-2 staining showed a decrease in the number of neurons and a increase in proportion of immature neurons. The difference was statistically significant (t=-3.66,P<0.01). Conclusion A wide range of gray matter lesions can be found in imaging detection, But most of the heterotopia diagnosis still depends on pathology. GFAP is valuable for the observation of the shape of the gray matter heterotopias. Counting NeuN and Map-2 positive cells can provide basis for the diagnosis of gray matter heterotopia.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?