The value of chest pain symptoms and its combination with supplementary examination in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease
WU Gui-jun,HAN Ya-ling,JING Quan-min,WANG Xiao-zeng,LI Yi,ZHANG Lei,HUO Yong,ZHANG Yan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-8812.2011.06.004
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the chest pain symptoms and its combination with supplementary examination in the diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods Total 9847 cases admitted to hospital with suspected CHD and diagnosed and excluded CHD by coronary angiography were divided into two groups: one was the chest pain group of 8156 cases and the other was non-chest pain group of 1672 cases. Chest pain and different types of supplementary examination(except for coronary angiography) constituted a combination of different diagnoses. We compared different diagnostic efficiency of CHD, studied population heterogeneity of chest pain characteristics in patients with CHD and studied the differences of coronary lesions severity in patients with CHD. Results (1) The prevalence of CHD is 65.2%. Chest pain symptoms combined with coronary CT angiography has the highest positive predictive value, negative predictive value, conformance and Youden index (95.1%, 43.6%, 76.3% and 0.560, respectively). Chest pain symptoms combined with exercise stress ECG has the highest specificity and false negative rate (74.9 and 89.8%, respectively), and has the lowest sensitivity, false positive rate, positive predictive value, conformance and Youden index (10.2%, 25.1%, 36.9%, 6.0% and -0.149, respectively). Chest pain symptoms combined with myocardial perfusion imaging has the highest sensitivity and false negative rate (95.7% and 98.4%, respectively), and has the lowest specificity, false negative rate and negative predictive value (1.6%, 4.3% and 20.0%, respectively). Chest pain symptoms combined with exercise stress ECG has higher specificity (74.9%). Chest pain symptoms combined with ECG has higher specificity (except for exercise stress ECG). (2) For the female patients with CHD, the proportion of chest pain group is higher than that of non-chest pain group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). For CHD patients who had smoking history, the proportion of the non-chest pain group is higher than that of chest pain group. The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). (3) Average count of CHD, the proportion of three lesions and the average total score of coronary artery lesions are higher in the chest pain group than in the non-chest pain group (three P<0.05). Conclusions (1) Myocardial perfusion imaging is an acceptable suggestion toward screening CHD. Exercise stress ECG is an acceptable suggestion toward diagnosing CHD. Resting ECG, attack ECG and 24-hour Holter are also an acceptable suggestion toward screening CHD. (2) For female patients with CHD, the proportion of chest pain is higher. For CHD patients who had smoking history, the proportion of non-chest pain is higher. (3) For patients with chest pain caused more severe degree of CHD.