Comparative Study on Clinical Efficacy of Comprehensive Treatment Plan of TCM and TACE in Treatment of Barcelona Stage C Liver Cancer

Bo PAN,Yong-bin MENG,Yu-yu GUO,Sha-sha YU,Xiao-feng ZHAI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13862/j.cnki.cn43-1446/r.2018.08.012
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To observe the difference between the treatment of hepatic arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and the combination of TCM and western medicine on primary liver cancer patients with barcelona stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (BCLC-C). Methods: A total of 98 patients with primary liver cancer in barcelona stage C were randomly divided into TACE group and integrative medicine treatment group. Patients in group TACE received interventional therapy with hepatic arterial chemoembolization. Patients in integrative medicine treatment group were treated with the combination of cinobufacini intravenous infusion and traditional Chinese medicine oral decoction. The progession free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed in the two groups. Results: The median PFS was 4.17 months [95% CI (2.17-6.17)]in the traditional Chinese medicine group and 4.27 months [95% CI(2.55-5.99)] in TACE group, which shows no significant difference(P>0.05). The median OS was 8.73 months [95% CI (0-18.54)] in the traditional Chinese medicine group and 10.33 months [95% CI (4.03-16.63)] in the TACE group, which shows no significant difference (P>0.05). The incidence of appetite loss, liver pain, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting in Chinese medicine treatment group was significantly lower than that in TACE group, and the rate of pateints with a stage A child-Pugh score liver function was higher than that of TACE group (P<0.05). Conclusion: The therapeutic effect on OS and PFS between TACE and chinese medicine treatment with conventional BCLC -C liver cancer shows no significantly difference, the method of comprehensive treatment of traditional Chinese medicine has little adverse reaction and high safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?