Abstract:Objective To explore the relationship between executive function and violent crime among male juveniles.Methods The subjects were 107 juvenile offenders with violent crime,107 offenders with nonviolent crime,and 107 male juveniles in vocational school as normal controls.All the participants were administered to the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Short Form (WAIS-SF),Intra/Extra Dimensional Set Shift (IED),Stockings of Cambridge (SOC) and Spatial Working Memory (SWM) in the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) and conducted analysis of variance and covariance.Results (1) There was no significant difference in IQ between violent group (98.3 ± 5.1) and nonviolent group (103.8 ± 5.5,P ＞ 0.05),However,both violent and nonviolent groups were significantly lower than normal control group (98.3 ± 4.3,all P ＜ 0.05).(2) With the exception of the ED errors,Three groups demonstrated significant differences in other cognitive indicators (F =3.05-9.74,P ＜ 0.05-0.01).Multiple comparison indicated that violent group exhibited significantly more total and pre-ED errors than nonviolent group and normal control group (all P ＜ 0.05),and fewer Number of Stages Completed than nonviolent group and normal control group (all P ＜ 0.05).But there was no significant difference between nonviolent group and normal controls on the IED test (all P ＞ 0.05).A significant group difference at mean moves (3,5-move) that reflected more moves were taken by the violent group than the normal control group (all P ＜ 0.05),and no differences between the nonviolent group and the normal control group (all P ＞0.05).There was no significant difference in mean initial thinking time(4-move) and mean initial thinking time(5-move) between violent group and nonviolent group (all P ＞ 0.05).However,both violent and nonviolent groups were significantly shorter in comparison to normal control group on the SOC test.In addition,violent group was significantly more than nonviolent group in between errors,and higher strategy score than normal control group on the SWM test (all P ＜ 0.05).(3) Finally,SOC problems solved in minimum moves and mean moves (5-move) became insignificant differences after controlling IQ (F =2.83,0.64,all P ＞0.05),but no statistically significant changes were found for the other executive functioning indicators.Conclusion Male juveniles with violent crime may have executive function deficits even IQ being controlled.

The Dark Triad, Creative and Impulsive Nonconformity in Fraud and Violent Offenders

Personality Traits as Predictors of Malevolent Creative Ideation in Offenders

Dark and bright personality dimensions as predictors of criminal behavior and recidivism

Relationship between executive function and violent crime in male juveniles

Differences in dark triad personality: Evidence from China and the USA

The Relationship Between Childhood Neglect and Malevolent Creativity: The Mediating Effect of the Dark Triad Personality

Dark Triad Traits, Social Position, and Personality: A Cross-Cultural Study

Dark Triad Psychopathy Outperforms Self-Control in Predicting Antisocial Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach

The dark triad and normal personality traits

The role of impulsivity in the Dark Triad of personality

A Comparison of Violent Attitude Between Passionate Criminals and Recidivists

The Dark Triad and risk behavior

The Ties That Bind: Low Morals, High Deception, and Dark Creativity

Criminal Genius or Everyday Villain? A Comparison of Malevolent Creativity Among Prisoners, Police Officers, and the General Population

The Core of Darkness: Uncovering the Heart of the Dark Triad

Do all roads lead to Rome? Authenticity, openness to experience, and risk-taking relate to general and malevolent creativity differently

Are the dark personalities sincere? Connections between the Dark Triad and the Big Three

Dark Triad Personalities, Self-control, and Antisocial/Criminal Outcomes in Youth

The Effects of the Dark Triad on Unethical Behavior