Effect of Bevacizumab Combined with Temozolomide on the Prognosis of Elderly Postoperative Patients with Glioblastoma

Bi-feng DONG,Ling CHEN,Liang LI,Luo-an FU,Wen-bo LIU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.21.019
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To investigate the effect of bevacizumab combined with temozolomide on the prognosis of elderly postoperative patients with glioblastoma.Methods:78 elderly postoperative patients with glioblastoma in Xijing hospital from January 2014 to January 2016 were selected and equally divided into the observation group and control group with 39 patients in each group according to different methods of treatment.The observation group was treated by bevacizumab combined with temozolomide,while the control group was given temozolomide treatment,the clinical effect,survival time and quality and life as well as the incidence of adverse reactions were observed and compared between two groups of patients.Results:The effective rate of observation group and control group were 48.7% and 23.1% respectively,which was significantly higher in the observation group than that of the control group (P<0.05).During the treatment period,the incidence of liver and kidney dysfunction,gastrointestinal reaction,fatigue,bone marrow suppression and other toxic side effects in the treatment group were significantly lowed than those of the control group (P<0.05).The KPS and ECoG scores in the observation group after treatment were 64.22± 2.19 points and 1.65 ± 0.45 points,the control group were 56.35 ± 4.50 points and 2.41± 0.51 points,significant differences were observed between two groups (P<0.05).The median survival time was 30 months and 21 months in the observation group and control group,and the 3 year survival rate of the observation group was 41%,the control group was 16.4%,the observation group were significantly better than the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion:Bevacizumab combined with temozolomide could improve the quality of life,therapeutic efficacy and prolong the survival time of elderly postoperative patients with glioblastoma.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?