Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Hysteroscopy Combined with Laparoscopy and Hysterosalpingography in the Treatment of Infertility

Mao LI,Yuan MA,Xin-xin LIANG,Dan LIU,Shui-jing YI
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13241/j.cnki.pmb.2017.29.040
2017-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy and hysterosalpingography in the treatment of infertility.Methods:100 cases of patients with infertility who were treated in our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were selected and divided into two groups according to the difference of treatment,the observation group was treated with hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopy,and the control group was treated with hysterosalpingography.The curative effect,intraoperative blood loss,operative time,length of stay,postoperative patency rate,ectopic pregnancy rate and intrauterine pregnancy rate were compared between two groups.Results:After treatment,the effective rate of observation group was 98.00%(49/50),which was significantly higher than that of the control group [76.00%(38/50)](P<0.05);the operation time and hospital stay of observation group were (36.15±12.37)min,(7.23± 1.39)d,which were significantly lower than those of the control group[(52.36± 15.43)min,(9.97± 1.62)d](P<0.05);the postoperative patency rate of observation group was 94.00%(47/50),which was significantly higher than that of the control group [72.00%(36/50)](P<0.05);the ectopic pregnancy rate of observation group was 6.00%(3/50),which was significantly higher than that of the control group[20.00%(10/50)](P<0.05);the intrauterine pregnancy rate of observation group was 6.00%(3/50),which was significantly higher than that of the control group [28.00%(14/50)](P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with the hysterosalpingography,hysteroscopy combined with laparoscopycan could more significantly improve the rate of intrauterine pregnancy and tubal patency rate with higher safety.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?