Clinical application of key-hole lateral mass decompression and discectomy under total spinal endoscopy in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy

陈涛,黄森,张成,马超,王振飞,戴尅戎,刘光旺

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20191203-00359

2020-01-01

Abstract:Objective:This study aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of minimally invasive keyhole lateral mass decompression and discectomy under total spinal endoscopy in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.Methods:The clinical data of 40 patients (23 males, 17 females, age range of 32-76 years) with single-level cervical spondylotic radiculopathy in Xuzhou Central Hospital from March 2016 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. In the open group, 20 cases underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion(ACDF). In the endoscopy group, 20 cases underwent minimally invasive keyhole lateral mass decompression and discectomy under posterior total spinal endoscopy with local anesthesia. The baseline data of patients, including operation time, bleeding, incision length, hospitalization time, hospitalization cost, and postoperative complications in the two groups were compared. The neck and arm visual analog scale (VAS) and the neck disability index (NDI) of patients in the two groups were compared before the operation; 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation; and on the last follow up. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the Odom’s grading method during the last follow up.Results:No statistically significant difference was found in the baseline data between the two groups (all P values>0.05). The endoscopy group had shorter operation time, less bleeding, smaller incision, shorter hospitalization time, and lower hospitalization cost than the open group, and the differences were statistically significant ( t=3.451, 15.844, 49.438, 6.772, 28.311, all P values<0.01). All patients were followed up for 12-24 months; one case of postoperative complications occurred in the open group and two cases in the endoscopy group. The VAS scores in the open and endoscopy groups were (2.90±0.42) and (2.11±0.29) points at 1 month before the operation, respectively, and the NDI scores were (21.75±3.85) and (17.60±2.04) points, respectively. The difference was statistically significant ( t=6.966, 4.260, all P values<0.01). However, no statistically significant difference was found in the VAS and NDI scores before the operation; 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation; and on the last follow up ( all P values>0.01). Clinical efficacy was evaluated in accordance with the Odom’s grading method during the last follow up. In the endoscopy group, 14 cases had an excellent rate, while four demonstrated a good rate. In the open group, 15 cases had an excellent rate and three exhibited a good rate. No statistically significant difference was observed in the excellent and good rates between the two groups ( Z=-0.311, P<0.05). Conclusions:Both types of operation obtained satisfactory clinical efficacy in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. However, minimally invasive keyhole lateral mass decompression and discectomy under posterior total spinal endoscopy with local anesthesia demonstrated the advantages of lessened trauma, quickened recovery, lessened cost, and high security, hence worthy of further promotion and application in clinics.