Analysis of the multifidus-longissimus intermuscular cleavage entrance in lumbar spine by magnetic resonance imaging

Tian Xia,Qian Wang,Shuanghai Dong,Jiwei Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2014.02.002
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To measure the distances from the intermuscular cleavage to the midline at each intervetebral disc level by MRI,and to analyze the related factors.Methods MRI scans of 200 patients taken during routine care (2012.04-2013.01) were retrospectively reviewed.The distances (D) from the intermuscular cleavage planes to the midline,bilaterally,at each disc level were measured.Oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and q test were used to compare the difference between the Ds of each intervertebral disc level.Paired t-test and independent t-test were used to compare Ds of different sides and genders.Pearson correlation test was used to analyze the correlation between the Ds of each intervertebral disc level.Multi-linear regression analysis was used to analyze the correlation between the D of each intervertebral disc level and the age,height,and body mass index (BMI).Results The mean measurements of D increase from L1/2 to L5/S1,and significantly different between all disc levels (lefi side:F =3 614.84,P =0.00; right side:F =3 411.34,P =0.00),but the Ds in left side did not significantly differed from that in right side.Ds only differed in L4/5 disc level between males and females (t =4.44,P < 0.01),while no significant difference was found in the other levels (all P values > 0.05).No correlation was discovered between ages with respect to measured distances.D1 positively correlated with height in males bilaterally.As in females,positive correlations were discovered between D1L,D1R,D2L and BMI,and bilateral D4 and height.Conclusions Little correlations are discovered between age,gender,BMI or height with respect to measured distances.In the upper levels of the lumbar spine (L1-3),it prefers approaching through a single midline incision,because of the small distance.In the lower levels of the lumbar spine (L4-S1),it prefers dual-incision paraspinal approach with preoperative localization via images of MRI or CT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?