Comparison of ultrosound and contrast-enhanced CT in the diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes metastasis in patients with thyriod carcinoma: A meta-analysis

Hongwen Li,Xinhui Xie,Bin Liu,Xingwang Wu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2014.05.011
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical value of ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in the diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes metastasis in patients with thyroid carcinoma by a meta-analysis.Methods Literature search was performed in Medline,Embase,Cochrane,CBM datebases to identify relevant English and Chinese literatures with pathological result as the gold standard from January 1995 to December 2012.The quality of each selected study was evaluated by QUADAS.The Meta-disc 1.4 software was used to calculate the pooled sensitivity,specificity and the corresponding 95% CI.Summary receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC),area under curve (AUC) and the Q * index were calculated and used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of the two methods by Z test.Results Totally seventeen literatures (1 682 patients) were included,the pooled sensitivity and specificity for and CECT scanning were 0.62,0.61 and 0.92,0.86.The AUC of the two were 0.84,0.82 respectively.There was no statistically significant difference between US and CT (P =0.78) in the Q* index(0.7718,0.7561).Conclusions US and CECT have similar value in the diagnosis of cervical lymph nodes metastasis in patients with thyroid carcinoma,but there is higher specificity in US than that in CECT.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?