Study on Application of the CS Stentless Pericardial Mitral Valve

GONG Guang-fu,HU Jian-guo,ZHOU Xin-Min,LIU Feng,LI Jian-min,ZHANG Wei,WANG Xiang,HU Ye-rong,CHEN Xiao-feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-7090.2005.04.001
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the characteristics of the tranditional stented pericardial valve and the CS stentless pericardial mitral valve in vitro and in vivo. Methods Tested valves were divided into two groups,group A--stented pericardial valve (similar in Ionescu-Shiley valve); group B--stentless pericardial mitral valve (similar in Quattro;fabricated in Central South University). The following items of the valves were compared:①calcification trends;②histology;③heat shrunk temperature; ④breaking strength;⑤biocompatibility;⑥hemodynamics;⑦fatigue test;⑧finite element analysis. Results ①Valves in Group B were less calcified than that in group A(n = 10,P 0.01).②Histology of valves in group A showed mass calcification and breaking down of collagen fibers,and only minimal calcification with collagen fibers was found in group B.③No significant difference on heat shrunk temperature between group B and A.④Breaking strength:the pericardium of group B was stronger than that in group A(P 0.005).⑤On 1st day,after endothelial cells(ECs) transplantation the amount of seeding cells in group A was less than that in group B with significant difference(P 0.001);on 3rd day,ECs were not found in group A,and ECs proliferated rapidly in group B,and most cultured cells showed positive factor Ⅷ related antigen reaction by immunohistochemistry assay.⑥There were 2,4,6 L at pulsatile flow,the transvalvular pressure gradient in group A were higher than that in group B with significant difference(P 0.05). The regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in group A were higher than that in group B with significant difference(P 0.01). There were no significant difference of EOA in group B and group A.⑦The life of valves in group B(n = 4) was 2.5 times longer than that in group A(n = 2). ⑧In group B valves showed more reasonable stress distribution than that in group. Conclusion The CS stentless pericardial mitral valves are avoiding from the concentrated stress area,and it's anticalcification,collagen fibers preservation,breaking strength,biocompatibility,hemodynamics and durability are more superior to the stented pericardial valve.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?