Comparative study of ALK antibody with manual and automatic immunohistochemical detec-tion in non-small cell lung cancer

Qin SHEN,Xuan WANG,Bo YU,Biao LIU,Yan XU,Yan-fen WANG,Qiu-yuan XIA,Xiao-jun ZHOU
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13315/j.cnki.cjcep.2015.03.007
2015-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To explore the immunohistochemical ( IHC) expression of ALK antibodies with different clones in anaplastic lym-phoma kinase ( ALK) gene fusion non-small cell lung cancer ( NSCLC) . Methods ALK expression in 60 NSCLCs were detected by IHC including autostainer (D5F3, Ventana+BenchMark) and manual staining using 4 different antibodies of D5F3 (Ventana), D5F3 (Cell Signaling), 1A4/1H7 (OriGene), 5A4 (Abcam), and all cases were verified with ALK FISH. Their expressions with 4 anti-bodies were compared with those by D5F3 (Ventana+BenchMark). Results 32 ALK gene rearrangement NSCLCs and 28 negative cases were identified by FISH and D5F3 (Ventana+BenchMark). The sensitivity of D5F3 (Ventana), D5F3 (Cell Signaling), 1A4/1H7 (OriGene), 5A4 (Abcam) was 93. 8%, 84. 4%, 93. 8%, 56. 3%, and all the speciticity was 100%. The consistency with D5F3 (Ventana+BenchMark) was 96. 7%, 91. 7%, 96. 7% and 76. 7%, respectively. The validity of immunohistochemical staining in surgical resection specimens was better than in small biopsies. Conclusion Effective routine manual immunohistochemistry with high-affinity antibody clone may provide a more economic and widespread pre-screening technique.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?