Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma and Renal Oncocytoma:A Comparative Study of Morphology,histochemistry and Immunophenotype

XIAO Li,LU Xiao-yu,CHEN Zhong-wei,YANG Wen-tao,ZHU Xiong-zeng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7399.2005.04.010
2005-01-01
Experimental Pathology
Abstract:Purpose To study the clinicopathological features, diagnosis and differential diagnosis of renal chromophobe cell carcinoma (CRCC) and renal oncocytoma. Methods 13 cases of CRCC and 6 cases of renal oncocytoma were observed with gross, microscopic and ultrastructural examinations,as well as detected by Hales iron and immunohistochemical stains. Results CRCC was comprised of solid structures with variable proportions of translucent and granular eosinophilic cells, showing wrinkled nuclei, and preinuclear halos. 6 cases were classified as eosinophilic variants of CRCC. Ultrastructural study revealed cytoplasmic microvescicles and mitochondria with tubulocystic cristae. Positive Hales colloidal iron staining was detected in 12/13 cases. Whereas oncocytoma was comprised of nests with granular eosinophilic cells, showing round nuclei with inconspicuous nucleoli. Cellular atypia was evident in 1 case(16.7%). Ultrastructurally, the tumor cells revealed cytoplasmic mitochondria with lamellar cristae. Hales colloidal iron staining was negative in all the cases. Of two tumors,E-cadherin and EMA were positive,but CD10, CK20 and vimentin were negative. CK7 stained strongly positive in 10/13 cases of CRCC, whereas focally positive in 2/6 cases of oncocytoma. Conclusions CRCC and renal oncocytoma have unique morphological features respectively, and share similarity in immunophenotype. Differential diagnosis is based on the growth patterns and cytological features. Hale's colloidal iron staining and ultrastructural examination are much helpful in distinguishing the two tumors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?