Implication of Endometrial ER and PR Expression for the Prognosis of Intrauterine Adhesions

Yuebin GONG,Dan CHENG,Li ZHOU,Wenjie YAN,Jingping YUAN,Likun GAO,Jing YANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3870/j.issn.1672-8009.2018.03.008
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective The endometrial expression of estrogen receptor ( ER) and progester-one receptor ( PR) were semiquantitatively analyzed in patients with intrauterine adhesions by using immunohistochemistry to explore their implication in the prognosis of intrauterine adhesions. Meth-ods Included in the study were 224 patients who had undergone hysteroscopy for clinical diagnosis of " uterine cavity adhesion" from December 2016 to August 2017 in the Wuhan People' s Hospi-tal, of Wuhan University. Endometrial specimens were intraoperatively obtained and the SP method was used to detect the endometrial gland and stromal ER and PR expression.①Fifty-two endometri-al specimens were collected from the uterine cavity hysteroscopically confirmed to be morphologically normal and examined for the expression of ER and PR in endometrial glands and interstitium, and the correlation between the expression levels and age, gravidity and parity and other factors.②172 endometrial specimens were selected. According to the criteria of the American Reproductive Society ( AFS) , 52 had no adhesions; 40 had mild adhesions 37 had moderate adhesions and 43 had se-vere adhesions. The correlation between the severity of adhesion and ER and PR expressions were analyzed.③ Fifteen specimens hysteroscopically collected from the same patients were compared in terms of the expression of ER and PR in the endometrium before and after treatment. Results ①ER expression was positively correlated with PR expression in endometrium. The expressions of ER and PR in endometrial glands and stroma were correlated ( P< 0. 001 ) .② The expression of ER and PR in endometrial glands was higher than in stroma. The expression of PR in endometrium was higher than in ER. The expression levels of ER and PR in endometrium were different ( P<0. 01 , P<0. 001 ) .③ The expression of ER and PE in endometrium was not correlated with age and ges-tational age.④ The expression levels of ER and PR in endometrium of non-adhesion group, mild adhesion group and severe adhesion group were significantly different ( P <0. 05 , P <0. 01 ) . There was no difference among the other groups.⑤ There was no significant difference in the ex-pression of ER and PR in endometrium before and after treatment. Conclusion Both ER and PR were expressed in the endometrial glands and interstitium. The expression of ER and PR in the gland was higher than in the interstitium. The ER and PR in the endometrium had the same expression profile. The expression of ER and PR in endometrial glands was negatively correlated with the de-gree of intrauterine adhesions. The expression of ER and PR in the endometrium did not experience change before and after treatment.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?