Clinical efficacy comparison of the different drug -combination treatments for non -steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs caused upper gastrointestinal hemorrage

张宪,刘红升,苏琴,赵晓东,姚咏明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2015.08.009
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze clinical haemostatic effect and incidences of adverse reactions of two different combination regimens for patients who suffered from upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage because of taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Methods 248 cases peptic ulcer patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage who visited our emergency room receiving treatment from January 2008 to August 2014 were randomly divided into two groups: group Esomeprazolc ( 140 patients ) and control group Omeprazolc ( 108 patients ) were treated with different treatment regimen.The efficacy, adverse reactions of test group and control group were comparative analyzed.Results The clinical total effective rate of test group and control group were 97.85% and 88.88%, respectively.Test group was significantly higher than control Group, by chi-square test (P<0.05).The average disappearance time of clinical symptoms in test group and control group were (3.2 ±2.1) d and (4.8 ±1.9) d, respectively.Test group was significantly shorter than control Group by analysis of variance (P<0.05). The adverse reaction rates of test group and control group by the chi -square test ( P >0.05 ) . Conclusion Esomeprazole united hemocoagulase treatment gastrointestinal bleeding caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is significantly better than omeprazole united hemocoagulase.Test group, which has hemostatic effect exactly, can effectively shorten the time of the patients stay in EICU&nbsp;and is the ideal emergency disposal measures.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?