Ulinastatin and thymosin α1 combined therapy or monotherapy for severe sepsis:a meta -analysis

冯筑生,王倩梅,范颖楠,尹文
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-1949.2015.09.003
2015-01-01
Abstract:Objcetive To analyze the safety and effectiveness of ulinastatin ( UTI ) and thymosin α1 (Tα1) combined therapy or monotherapy for severe sepsis .Mtehods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for the literature which was about UTI and /or Tα1 for severe sepsis . Randomized controlled trial ( RCT) was evaluated by the Cochrane handbook 5.1.0 .Analyses and syntheses of data were performed and forest plot and funnel plot were drawn by the Review Manager 5.3 statistics software.Results 10 articles and 12 studies were taken into meta -analysis.The statistical analysis results between experimental group and control group in subgroups were as follows : ①In the subgroup of UTI and Tα1, there were significant differences in 28-day mortality [RR=0.67, 95%CI (0.57, 0.80), P<0.00001]; there were significant differences in 90-day mortality [RR=0.74, 95%CI (0.64, 0.85), P <0.0001]; there were significant differences in length of mechanical ventilation [MD=-1.51, 95%CI (-2.93 , -0.09), P=0.04];there were significant differences in 28-day APACHEⅡscores [MD=-3.39, 95% CI ( -5.89, -0.90), P=0.008].②In the&nbsp;subgroup of UTI , there were significant differences in length of mechanical ventilation [ MD=-4.40, 95%CI (-7.55, -1.25), P=0.006].③In the subgroup of Tα1, there were significant differences in 28 -day mortality [RR =0.72, 95% CI (0.55, 0.93), P =0.01]; there were significant differences in length of antibiotics use [MD=-6.00, 95% CI ( -8.14, -3.86), P<0.00001]. Conclusion According to the current data , UTI and Tα1 combined therapy for severe sepsis can reduce 28-day mortality, 90 -day mortality, length of mechanical ventilation and 28 -day APACHEⅡscores.UTI can reduce length of mechanical ventilation .Tα1 can reduce 28-day mortality and length of antibiotics use.However, there are a small number of studies in each subgroup and the heterogeneity in secondary outcomes is obvious , and the further conclusion needs to be validated by more high quality RCTs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?