Abstract:Background: An effective emergency triage system is lacking in mainland China. The Chinese Emergency Triage Scale (CETS) was developed based on vital complaints and vital parameters, according to Chinese data. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the CETS by emergency department (ED) nurses in eight EDs in mainland China. Design: A cross-sectional multi-center study was conducted. Settings: Eight EDs in the eastern, western, northern, and central areas of mainland China. Participants: A total of 51 ED nurses and 8000 active ED patients participated in the study between May and September 2018 in eight EDs. Methods: Standardized triage scenarios and active patients were assigned to nurses who used the CETS for evaluative purposes. Accuracy was defined by concordance with the key for the scenarios and was calculated as percentages. Inter-rater reliability was measured by weighted kappa to compare the triage nurse's rating with the research nurse's acuity level for each patient. The triage time and clinical outcome of 1000 active patients per site also were collected. The criterion-related validity of the CETS was evaluated; criteria included ED mortality, number of patients discharged, and admission to ICU or general ward. The relationship between the CETS acuity levels triaged by the research nurse and four possible outcomes was assessed with a cross-classification table, using a chi-square test. The ability of the CETS to predict ED mortality was assessed via the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve (AUC). Results: Mean pooled accuracy from all sites was 89.4% (95% CI = 86.9%-91.8%), and the proportion of over-triage slightly exceeded under-triage (6.5% vs. 4.1%). There was no difference in accuracy between sites or according to nurse experience. Inter-rater reliability values for triage nurses and research nurses were 0.96 (95% CI = 0.95-0.97), based on the quadratic weight kappa. Trauma cases were assigned to triage with greater accuracy than were nontrauma cases, both for the scenarios and for active patients. The average triage time of ED nurses in all sites was 151.5 +/- 26.3 s, using the computer-based triage instrument. The chi-square test showed that there was a significant difference in triage time between the CETS levels (p < 0.001). The AUC was 0.968 (95% CI = 0.958-0.979). Conclusions: The CETS is a reliable system for ED triage and can promote rapid and effective triage in mainland China. (C) 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. (http://creativecommons.orgilicenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Establishment and verification of the emergency severity index scoring system for acute coronary syndrome patients with chest pain

Reliability and Validity of the Four-Level Chinese Emergency Triage Scale in Mainland China: A Multicenter Assessment

Comparison of the New Injury Severity Score and the Injury Severity Score in Multiple Trauma Patients

[Study on the Efficiency of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (euroscore) in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of the Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention].

Application of trauma assessing method to a emergency triage

Development of an Initial Screening Scale to Detect Patients With Chest Pain From Acute Coronary Syndrome in the Emergency Department

Impact of coronary risk scores on disposition decision in emergency patients with chest pain

The application value of SCS scoring system in emergency department

Use of Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by Simplified Motor Score in a Five-Level Triage System: Identifying Trauma in Adult Patients at a High Risk of Mortality

Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain

Application of the Modified Early Warning Score System in the Triage of the Chest Specialist Emergency

Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for patients with chest pain: a systematic literature review

A new score for the diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome in acute chest pain with non-diagnostic ECG and normal troponin

The Diagnostic Evaluation of the SINEH Cardiopulmonary Triage Scale and the Emergency Severity Index in the Emergency Department: A Comparative Study

[Consistency of Injury Severity Score in Severe Trauma Patients].

A systematic review of the applicability of emergency department assessment of chest pain score‐accelerated diagnostic protocol for risk stratification of patients with chest pain

HEART vs EDACS Scores on Predicting Major Events Among Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome at the Cardiac Emergency Department

Establishment of a scoring scheme for diagnosis of coronary heart disease in patients with atypical angina and effect of coronary computerized tomographic scanning on it

Validation of a Novel Clinical Prediction Score for Severe Coronary Artery Diseases Before Elective Coronary Angiography.

Abstract 14253: Combining History Of Present Illness With Risk Stratification Scores To Predict Intensive Care Admission For Suspicious Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients In The Emergency Department

External validation of a triage tool for predicting cardiac arrest in the emergency department