Application of the Remote Blood Glucose Control System for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Management in Community
Wei-jia GONG,Jun YAO,Yuan-yuan LIAN,Ya-li SUN,Li-na ZHANG,Meng FAN,Jun-qing ZHANG,Xiao-hui GUO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2018.04.020
2018-01-01
Chinese General Practice
Abstract:Objective To explore the application of the remote blood glucose control system for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management in community. Methods A total of 363 newly diagnosed but poorly controlled T2DM patients from Shichahai Community Health Service Center were selected in Xicheng District of Beijing from June 2012 to May 2013. They were randomly divided into the control group (n=184) and the experimental group (n=179) by random number table. Patients in the control group received conventional blood glucose management while the community health service center carried out remote blood glucose control on patients in the experimental group. Patients in both groups were followed up for one year. Results of laboratory examinations before the intervention and 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention were compared between two groups, which included fasting blood glucose (FPG), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), creatinine (Cr), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and a seven-day diet control. Results Test results of FPG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, Cr and the seven-day diet control differed significantly in two groups (P<0.05). These results differed significantly between two groups at different time points (P<0.05). Intervention methods and different time points had an interaction on the results of FPG, TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, Cr and the seven-day diet control (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in HbA1c, TG and SBP between two groups (P>0.05), but they showed significant differences in the same group at different time points (P<0.05). Intervention methods and different time points had an interaction on the results of HbA1c, TG, and SBP (P<0.05). The DBP results showed no significant differences between two groups (P>0.05) or at different time points (P>0.05). There was no interaction on DBP between intervention methods and different time points (P>0.05). Conclusion Remote blood glucose control system has positive effects on type 2 diabetes mellitus management in community and improves patients'metabolism.